OsaErisXero

That this has all of a sudden occurred, and so consistently, is in some ways more frightening than the headlines on their own.

I will admit that it took me far longer than it should have to realize that you meant season 3 and not an s3 bucket.

And that’s what I get for not reading the article all the way

Commercial breaks are also breaks in the debate where the candidate can stop and think/get fed his next talking point/line

Can’t imagine how this could be perceived as anything but retaliation for the EU daring to attempt to regulate Apple

If ace combat has taught me anything, it’s that there’s no reason we can’t do both

This is not precisely accurate. These are individually addressible and can be commanded to change what’s displayed based on any arbitrary input, such as detection of a critical mass of apple products in that part of the store, or a device which is signed into a store account on the store app, accurate down to about 3 meters last time I looked at the state of presence analytics tech. So you absolutely could have 20% higher prices follow a person around a store if you wanted to.

Those people don’t feel threatened by the groups they dislike when those groups are suppressed sufficiently to not cross into the mainstream. Pride used to be a San Francisco thing, Hispanics and other various ‘Brown people’ stayed in their own parts of towns, etc. As those groups make further inroads into ‘mainstream’ the groups who used tho think they were the majority, the racists and homophobes, etc, (or, maybe were the majority if you look back far enough) who saw those groups as an inconvenience now see them as an active threat and are responding accordingly, lashing out at any soft target that presents itself.

Going to second this. It hit critical mass of users where the all feed isn’t just one person’s special interests just after the thread a few months back and it’s like i never moved.

Won’t somebody please think of the shareholders

I would imagine a production version of this would have predefined cut lines to pull a chunk out for working on stuff in or under the foundation

Well, so much for that

I don’t know if this post was intended to be a reply to me or not, since I wasn’t talking about Biden at all, but I’ll have a go at it:

I think you’re right, and that a Dem candidate who actually quacked like a duck consistently would perform better, but party leadership, rightly or wrongly, seems to be banking on keeping their current voters and trying to entice disaffected GOP voters (read: women), particularly in purple states, to either stay home (I hate both of them i’m not going) or vote Dem in a “at least he’s not like Bernie, but maybe I can have healthcare again” sense. I live in Missouri, and my neighborhood had conservative grandmas out canvasing for ballot initiatives on the abortion issue for the first time since moving here, so I’ll allow that they might be on to something, even if I don’t agree with the tactic.

EDIT: to clarify, they were trying to put a ballot initiative to add abortion as a right to the Missouri constitution

The problem is that trump is far from the only serious problem facing America.

No, he’s not, but resolving him is critical path to resolving the rest of them. In this case, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to focus in on November and the few months following it.

You are generally right, but “Stand back and stand by” was pretty fucking blatant, and nobody who wasn’t searching for a reason it wasn’t an issue ‘misunderstood’ the message.

Nova got bought? Is that what happened to them? :(

None that I’m aware of, but for a copyright to be asserted in the US a human must be associated with it as a consequence of the monkey selfie case. My reading is that this would cover the edge case of an anonymous, unknown poster submitting the work, allowing Cara to act as the default rights holder unless otherwise asserted by a person or user.

No, it doesn’t. It states that the copyrighted works are the property of Cara and/or the artist who created the Works, except where otherwise noted. This specifically would cover cases where someone attempts to claim that a Work they found on Cara isn’t copyrighted because a copyright notice wasn’t explicitly stated, and doesn’t make explicit claims over the ownership of any arbitrary Work. For it to work in the way you’re claiming, the “or” cannot be present as it being there implies the existence of Works on the site which Cara does not have property rights to. Who actually possesses the property rights to any given Work is left, apparently intentionally, ambiguous.

In a sane world, one of two things would happen, ideally both:

Immediate Impeachment and motion for a mistrial be granted

Arrest for Obstruction of Justice

This account lacks commitment to the bit