Ooops

That already happened a long time ago.

On one hand nazi is just a meaningless word for “I don’t agree with them” but on the other hand the actual risk are all those left-green fascist degenerates trying to destroy the country… Why would the fascists have called themselves national socialists if they weren’t left. *wink wink*

Not on an official state visit at least…

Nope, this is “Your system ran out of memory and now this program isn’t reacting anymore (it’s trying to allocate memory but there is no free memory left). Please stop the program or try to get rid of some of its subprocesses to free up memory.”

Do I condemn Hamas’ atrocities?

I condemn every single atrocity, whomever is the perpetrator or the victim […], at the same time, I celebrate anyone who risks their life to TEAR DOWN THE WALL.

[…]

Are Israelis not justified to fear that Hamas wants to exterminate them?

Of course they are! Jews have suffered a Holocaust that was preceded with pogroms and a deep-seated antisemitism permeating Europe and the Americas for centuries.

[…]

So, let’s be clear: If Jews were under attack, anywhere in the world, I would be the first to canvass for a Jewish Congress in which to register our solidarity.

(from the speech published later, when he was not allowed to talk there…)

So in short:

• I normaly condemn violence in general but I don’t condemn Hamas but cheer for them.
• The only antisemitism Israel should be afraid of comes from Europe and America.
• No Jew in the world was actually attacked… as I would have stood with them then.

What an impressive example of a voice of reason for Palestina… totally not an antisemitic, lying populist cheering for Hamas’ attacks while at the same time denying any Jew got attacked. What a f****ng 🤡.

Thank you for perfectly demonstrating my point. You are an idiot thinking this is a team sport, “your” side is right and everybody not sharing your exact opinion is wrong and the enemy.

And because everyone is the same on that “other side” I somehow become a zionist bombing civilians in your alternative world view, although I could impossibly qualify for that definition by any degree.

And also because everything on your side needs to be righteous you twist reality to fit your view. I explicitly asked how to effectively separate Palestinian civilians in Gaza from their de facto Hamas governmemnt. Yet somehow in your brain that question translated to the exact opposite of what I actually said: That somehow every civilan in Gaza is part of Hamas.

Seriously… how fucked up is your delusion that things you read instantly transform to mean something completely different, just so they fit the imaginary point you are trying to make?

Hamas plans a genocide of Jews on one hand -without limited success so far, but not for a lack of trying- and actively helps with worsening the situation in Gaza on the other because they can use deaths there for their propaganda. Israel isn’t shy about killing as many Palestinians as possible either, because not reacting to Hamas terror isn’t an option, but any reaction will produce a negative reaction and tons of propaganda anyway. So why not go all in?

So which side are you talking about? The one commiting genocide or the genocidal one? No, Palestinian civilians are sadly not a valid side you can chose as they are de facto governed by Hamas in Gaza… unless you have a plan to separate one from the other somehow. Please then go on and tell the plan to world leaders unsuccessfully looking for such a solution for many, many years now.

Or in short: Pretending there are easy sides, with one being right and one wrong, is not a solution but indeed part of the problem.

Canonical is basically the closed to corporate Linux you will find on the free distro market… They are pushing stuff you don’t want for marketing reasons (for example their own proprietary Snaps when a better working open source solution already exists with Flatpack), love their telemetry (can be mostly disabled for now, but given the defaults and their other behavior we can already see where this is heading) and in general decide more alongside their latest business plan than actually making sense or listening to users.

Nothing outrageous about banning a liar and propagandist from spreading lies and propaganda in our country.

Ffs… he even published the speech he was going to give there and it was hard to swallow so much bullshit. On the plus side, he basically answered questions about Hamas atrocities and their threat to Israel with (paraphrasing) “I condemn atrocities in general but here I celebrate the people that attacked Israel” and “What threat? Israel is only afraid because of rampant anti-semitism in Europe and America”.

So we know were he stands and if you ask me he can go get fucked with the Hamas buddies he supports.

But that’s okay as it’s rolling release and unlike other distros you only need to do it exactly once…

My first thought was: So Slackware works very well but is ugly as hell?

But those aren’t affected usually. For them it’s about stability because their certification processes are a lot of work and they won’t risk any interruptions unless absolutely necessary. So they actually pay a lot of money for support beyond the normal EOL.

Putin can actually claim whatever he wants and does so regularly. No one actually cares. And no claim or “being allowed to claim something” will actually change reality.

That’s because the drivers are bullshit but not the problem in general. They work well for some very specific cards, not at all for other and in general it’s just random hit or miss.

And then, to make it more fun, not all wayland compositors are born equal either.

Countries with working national legislation at home for decades are somehow “reactionary cultures”, while countries that failed to introduce any legislation against rape at home because that would cost them support from their retarded voters are now disappointed the EU didn’t force them to do it.

All that while any votes against this were purely based on the EU not being responsible here anyway and not wanting to create a precedence of the EU creating national law outside their jurisdiction.

So this article piece of trash manages to tell us none of the facts, but a lot of feelings wrapped up in a lie. Peak journalism…

Zensursuala/Flinten-Uschi/Ursula von der Leyarbeit performs exactly as expected in every job she gets. The she’s promoted away to the next post… I’m really eager to know what her next position will be.

You say this as if the housing market issue isn’t created by policies. And as if there was some magical massive influx of immigrants when it’s in fact still too low to (even in addition to existing birth rates) keep the population stable.

So it’s not exactly an unsolvable problem. In fact babies tend to be incredible expensive and bad at working, so any other population increase (or just stabilisation of numbers) would be even more expensive.

If your plan is however to not address any existing issues, then yes. In that scenario immigration will bring additional problems. But that’s not the point.

But immigration needs to be treated in a partisan way as there are two ways to handle it: proper integration or far-right deportation fantasies.

Neither are they a left party (or is “left” the new definition for parroting conspiracy theories, Kremlin narratives and anti-imigration hate speech and populist talking points?) nor is a new party barely getting enough votes to into parliaments and majorily getting their votes from former none-voters some kind of shake-up.

And in the same time they will save (also in the article) 2.8 trillion (or 100 billion on average per country) in fossil fuel imports and 2.5 trillion (or 90 billion per country) in prevented damages.

So I’d call this a great bargain…

Now, we only need to explain them the obvious: Who starts early will get a higher share of the savings.

It doesn’t ewven need to when (by the article linked) those investments are one side of a plan that also includes saving 2.8 trillion in fossil fuel exports in the same time, while also projecting +2.4 trillion in damages if no climate action is taken.

And that’s not even a new thing. We know that taking climate action now will actually save us money, short and long term. But it will also decrease the money paid by lobbyists to politicians and media and the profits of fossil fuel companies, so we will get headlines like these and a lot of political narratives to discourage us.