![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
Right, the options in this election are:
- Mildly senile and slightly incompetent old man
- Fascist
Right, the options in this election are:
Yeah, what’s wrong with GNOME’s calendar? It’s basic and it works… fine. I use it for my daily tasks.
Window’s default calendar is similarly mediocre.
You don’t seem to know the meaning of the word “spend”.
How much have I bought in crypto to hold myself? I don’t hold any crypto. The answer is zero.
The figure that appears in column E of Form 8949? Over a million USD.
You answers seethe of jealousy. You keep trying to pin the label “crypto bro” on me because you want to dismiss me as someone not worth listening to, and the money I earned as illegitimate and fake. You argue not because you think you’re right, but because you can’t bear to be wrong. To you, crypto is a scam with no use and everything it touches turns to shit, and everyone who says otherwise must therefore hold the opposite opinion and think everything it touches turns to gold. Binary thinking at its worst.
Your thinking is simplistic and devoid of nuance. You’re right about one thing though. I am condescending. Because you deserve it.
Reply if you desperately need to put in the last word with a feigned aura of coolness, and laugh it off, because there are no more arguments to be made. Only insults left. You won’t receive a response, and I won’t even read whatever you write, because this conversation is over.
Go buy a Cybertruck or something.
Read carefully, because it seems that reading comprehension is not your strong suit.
Wiktionary defines “crypto bro” as “an enthusiastic cryptocurrency supporter, usually male, especially a dogmatic and condescending one”.
You may notice I do not fit any of those categories, besides perhaps being male.
For the adoption of cryptocurrency by businesses and states, I am apathetic, even mildly in opposition. As for being dogmatic, I entirely am not, because I don’t give a shit.
But I will admit, you have successfully tempted me into being condescending towards you.
This is not different from five state-wide positions with a requirement that the candidates live in a specific region. It’s weird but not particularly unfair.
It’s just a matter of presentation.
Why would I make up the number 1 most common interaction between a Cybertruck owner and a normal person?
But here’s a picture I took of his car while he was attending church (across the street from the grocery store):
And yes, you can tell it is new because it doesn’t have a number plate yet.
The picture was taken on 30 March, the interaction happened a few days earlier
(past tense)
But how do you define “crypto bro”? Sure not “any person who’s ever held cryptocurrency”, right? Because that would make 25% of the US population crypto bros.
I absolutely reject this categorisation. I don’t give a shit about crypto or any of the ideas behind it. It’s interesting from a technical perspective as a person who holds a computer science degree, but I’m in it for the money. Holding crypto is gambling, and nothing more.
The only crypto I hold now is for online poker sites and for buying precious metals on r/pmsforsale on Reddit.
What makes you think I’m a crypto bro?
I was walking to the grocery store when I saw a neighbour polishing his in front of his house. I said “Wow, a Cybertruck,” and he replied, “Cool, isn’t it?”
I said, “No, it’s a $120,000 go-kart made of scrap metal that will rust in a month.”
Edit: sounds fake but I do have a picture of the car in question, but I took it on a different day—
The effectiveness of bans has always hinged on two factors:
For example, everyone knows that the odds of being caught speeding are pretty low, but if the punishment for speeding is ten years imprisonment, then very few people will risk speeding.
Similarly, even if the odds of getting caught violating this law is only 1%, if the punishment is banning the platform and shutting down the company along with a fine equal to a year’s worth of revenue, then companies will probably not want to risk it.
I think it’s also the case that it has a bigger impact on developing brains, who might be more easily addicted.
I don’t have any evidence for this, I’m just guessing here.
Or maybe ten months in Landsberg Prison
Glad to see that charging people who betray their country with high treason is back in style.
In my opinion, all of because I don’t care.
I am talking about quickly reducing the heat of a pan which, for example, has a sauce in it that is close to burning without having to move it to another burner.
I didn’t say it heats up food faster. I know it doesn’t. I say the stove gets hot faster, which is not the same thing. And it also cools off faster. So if you have a sauce that’s burning, you can quickly shut it off instead of having to move the pan.
But the fact that I use a wok I think is still a good reason to prefer gas.
I didn’t say anything about cooking speed. I said it gets hot fast and cools down fast. As in you can quickly shut off the heat when a sauce is about to burn without having to move it to another burner.
Please put them in text. I’m not watching a whole Technology Connections video for this.
Biden: I’m going to give billions of dollars to Israel to kill Palestinians
Trump: I’m going to give billions of dollars to Israel to kill Palestinians and I’m going to egg them on while doing that and block other countries from helping