Tiger bread is very versatile - good for toast, good for sandwiches, good for dipping in soup, etc.
I’m not sure I know anyone who doesn’t like tiger bread.
I’m also only just learning that it’s a Dutch invention? It’s sold in every supermarket in the UK. Seemingly came out of nowhere here in the early 2010s.
They broke RIF with the API changes, and Voyager for Lemmy was the recommended alternative at the time. Still here 3 years later.
I haven’t fully deleted my Reddit account because, as much as I hate to admit it, the site is often a good source of information for hobby projects etc, but I’ve gone completely read-only. I get what I need and then leave - no voting, no comments, no messaging.
FYI you can access and download iCloud photos on a computer, which might help your wife transfer them without using her phone.
Which? argues that a customer who would have theoretically paid £1.99 for the service but was not able to do so because the actual £2.99 price was unaffordable suffered a £1 loss, even though the customer paid nothing.
Maybe you have to be a lawyer to understand this, because to me it sounds like complete nonsense.
Yep, CotEditor is fantastic - solo dev and they’re very careful to follow the actual macOS interface guidelines, so it looks and feels native throughout.
Not these days. Apple hasn’t launched a new product with the ‘i’ prefix since Steve Jobs was around.
I’m willing to bet it’s people seeing an ‘AI bad’ headline, upvoting, and moving on without reading.
I don’t like AI either but the hivemind on the fediverse is just as bad as back on Reddit sometimes.
I’m not certain. That might fall under falsely implying endorsement, which is one of the few exceptions.
Fun fact: there’s no general concept of image/likeness rights in the UK, and photographers own the full copyright of any photos they take.
There are other laws that come into play if you were in a private place or if your likeness is used to falsely imply endorsement, but otherwise if someone takes your photo in public they can do whatever they want with it.
(Obvious disclaimer that I’m not a lawyer but the above is my understanding of the law.)
Because it’s a service using cloud AI. Processing text uses tokens, tokens cost money, hence the subscription fee.
It’s a dumb app - deliberately so - but it costs money to run and a one-off payment won’t cut it if people start using it to modify hundreds or thousands of emails.
No, the users are definitely also criminals.
This article is a couple of years old but goes into some of the factors involved. It specifically covers mobile SOCs but they’re still ARM.
That said, I’m no hardware expert so others may be able to explain in more detail.
In some cases they’re deliberately allowed to operate as a honey trap, allowing authorities to identify and arrest as many users as possible.
If you simply shut the site down, the users go elsewhere and you have to find them again.
Kind of funny to see the Lemmy version of this meme in action.
I don’t think I’ve ever wiped my phone camera lenses.
The case I use has a lip around the camera module that keeps it recessed, so they never really touch anything. Looking at them now, they’re perfectly clean.
Hilarious that you got downvoted into the negative for daring to voice a dissenting opinion. Truly, Lemmy is a child of Reddit.
Edit: Back above zero! I take it back, maybe I spoke too soon?
I strongly oppose the use of generative AI in art but if it has to be done, it should at least be labeled as AI.
I know I’m mostly preaching to the choir here, but I don’t think there’s any situation in which AI ‘has’ to be used in art.
Some that come to mind that I don’t see on your list:
Also, out of interest, why no 70s Hanna-Barbera?
I don’t think betting on sports should be illegal. The problem is the endless advertising and the way sportsbooks have invaded and completely taken over sports coverage in the media. Feels like literally everything now is just about discussing under/overs and what Vegas thinks.
Call me crazy but I miss when sports was about sports.