Get a carbon monoxide detector.

Not only can the kisses that feel good not look good they can also at the moment of maximum feel goodness make a sort of farting sound.

The key phrase that explains it all here might be AI.

Companies think and make decisions in this way all the time, against consumer planned obsolescence is a fundamental part of their philosophy. Usually it is in ways that are too technical or esoteric for the general user to follow but here they have forgot themselves and made a play that is obvious to a great many of their customers.

This feels like when that fish was discovered that was thought to have been extinct for millions of years.

The money is flooding in from people who see vast automated workforces and robot armies to protect them. What they do not see is who will buy the output and that those armies will determine no ultimate difference between the owners they are protecting and the population they are protecting them from.

And silly laws teach people they don’t have to obey the law.

Building picket fences around the ocean.

They want people fawning in person, remote fawning is not so moist xxx

Whoever is chasing.

I read your reply as snarky but I think it may have been just differences in phrasing.

Your best guess is reasonable, I may have misremembered, it could have been A’ spoken as A dash and meaning the complement and I hallucinated the negative but I think I recall some noted confusion with the reciprocal x-¹ = 1/x.

It was a shorthand he used, he wrote it as a superscript, it must of been his own, it was useful in terms of statistics analysis.

My old statistics lecturer would write x-¹ as shorthand meaning everything that is not x, I thought it was in more common usage but perhaps not. I know it more generally means the reciprocal, he just expected you to know which he meant by context.

Today software engineers and tomorrow software engineers minus one.

Sonderkommando.

It is always a shock to graduates that they have to go on thinking.

The ability to ‘override automatic responses and maintain complex goals’ is why we get up at six in the morning to go to a meeting we already know the outcome of and frankly I am not sure its something that is working for us.

Having those who write the OS so incestuously involved in hawking hardware is probably a bad idea and unsustainable when they have so demonstrably switched their emphasis to forcing new kit.

Don’t bother the answer is 42.