![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
i can excuse hiring mercenaries to rough a guy up for leaking cards, but using AI art is a step too far!
i can excuse hiring mercenaries to rough a guy up for leaking cards, but using AI art is a step too far!
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
you can be annoyed about something someone is doing without making some personal judgement about that someone
if my train is late because the train driver had a heart attack im aware that its not the drivers fault, but im still not going to be thrilled about my luck
thats bad, but still not as bad as the government responding with mandates on what women are or are not allowed to wear, nor is this an answer to the problem
like, how do you reckon this is going to pan out? you reckon women who actually are coerced into covering up are going to take it off when they go to public buildings (including schools), or do you reckon the men in their life just wont let them go to public buildings (including schools) anymore?
the right either has not thought about this law or is completely disingenuous about why they support it
no
im aware that it was largely a rich few that were actually responsible for these acts, im arguing that responsibility isnt all that relevant
it shouldnt be about chastising or punishing, it should be about getting folks who continue to have an advantage from horrendous acts to help out folks who continue to have a disadvantage resulting from those horrendous acts in order to level the playing field, because thats the right thing to do
in theory a lot or europeans are still living comfortably off of the horrific crimes they committed, and african and caribbean nations are still struggling and at a massive disadvantage compared to where they could have been
in practice i doubt this money would come from those most responsible, and i doubt the money would go to those with the biggest disadvantages
i also dislike reparations in general compared to help for the sake of help, as it draws focus away from whether nations actually need help and how much, and instead operates entirely on a blame game
not that help for the sake of it is going to happen sufficiently either anyway
deleted by creator
how are their unemployed actually doing?
and wheres that 22% coming from, what with them not publishing the numbers?
you need to take a lot more drastic action than just voting, because your options are fascists or polite fascists
but it noticeably altered Hillary into this jaded cynic completely lacking in vision or idealism
it noticeably altered hillary clinton into hillary clinton
this is an extraordinarily terrible title
i think youre commenting on the wrong post, ‘not being able to oppress people’ isnt featured in this one
this one actually specifically features religious oppression getting approved as law
luckily for those dipshit cultists whoops sorry, ‘muslim women whose safety we care about very much’, getting forced to go against their fundamentalist families or bite continuous fines is very safe, and will turn out very well for them
but presumably you do see the severeral photos of protestors, including men, in the capital of iran regardless of what other pictures might also be on the page
…so as i was saying, i am glad we are fighting women being forced to dress themselves a certain way by forcing them to dress themselves a certain way
not even trying to mask that this law is literally just about bullying muslims lol
no dont worry, its only the brown people face coverings that are bad
what does that even mean? ‘ok he supports a genocidal ethnostate, but its only cause of power projection in the middleeast’