![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Correct. They have to prove that it caused damage.
Correct. They have to prove that it caused damage.
Yeah me too. Better than the alternative.
I can see the “actually we still havent had a woman president” “jokes” from here (through time)
She’s a monster just like her husband
Uhh… Am I the only one who says “because LGBTQ persons make up like 10% of the population?” I’m pretty sure the headline left out a “proportionally” somewhere but… Hmmm.
Its Microsoft they’re not that smart.
And incumbency absolutely does propelled a candidate across the finish line. The vast amount of presidents in recent history are two-term presidents. Trump is an exception.
Okay I didn’t that because its likely off topic.
This article is about a statistic, which says (very narrowly) that Biden (is currently) polling better than other hypothetical nominees. I’m saying that this is because Biden is more well known, due to his incumbency.
This statistic does not and can not sat anything about if a different Democratic candidate would poll better or worse than Biden if they were nominated or were the presumptive nominee.
Because Biden is the president, he is in the news more, and is more recognizable, and thus more people “like” him than whoever else was listed on this study.
There is a reason incumbents are almost always the nominee. Voters are generally not well educated and the vast majority of them just know Biden.
Compared to other democratic candidates, biden has a leg up because incumbency. This link is about the nominee, not who wins.
And trump absolutely benefited from incumbency. The whole GOP practically rebuilt itself around him.
This is a meaningless poll. Bidden has a leg up because of his incumbency and because he’s the presumptive nominee
Yeah… I hate it too. I really wish for even just the popular vote but ideally most-approved or ranked-choice voting.
But as always, not voting just shifts candidates away from you so they can get more votes they need to win.
Of course.
And yeah carrier locking is already illegal [if the phone is fully paid for].
But I can use a non Verizon phone on Verizon? Are they just trying to dissuade it because the people doing hotspot bypass are likely gonna do the research.
Edit: oh yeah ads. Of course it’s ads.
Hmmm
Thoughtcrime
…ugh.
I’m torn. One part of me says that search engines should ignore this if enough pages link to it (maybe only indexing title). But… Ugh.
Fear?