![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
What are you even talking about?
CEO of Juke LTD.
What are you even talking about?
Cat, I farted.
Just at first look I found this:
https://www.wtb.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2021_Aug_UBI_project_plan.pdf
But that’s 2021 lemme see if there’s anything more recent.
This seems to be the primary source for all these recent articles:
Did you watch the “fight”? The “instigator” goes down almost immediately and then starts getting her head smashed into the pavement. All I’m saying is, from watching the video, the “fight” ends as soon as it starts and then turns into pounding someone’s head onto pavement and then a brawl while they lay motionless on the ground with the occasional twitch and groan. Not saying anyone is in the right anywhere in this situation. But I would argue things very quickly leave the realm of reasonable self defense in the video.
But only if you openly organize, if you do it in secret it’s all good. Am I getting that right?
We had to replace slavery with somethi…. Well… still slavery but with some extra steps.
Breh modern US police forces have a direct lineage to slave catchers. I know we’re talking pedantics at this point but I genuinely think founded is the more appropriate word.
Oh you were replying to the other one got it my bad.
Roy Cohn is not a homosexual. Roy Cohn is a heterosexual man, Henry, who fucks around with guys.
No, no aww, Roy Cohn was a shitheel.
I nominate this for worst idea of the decade.
The published study in question. I don’t mind an article write up, but this is a write up of a write up of a write up.
I would love a cultural norm of always posting the actual study alongside write-ups
First the deliberate there/their BS on the other post, and now literally ? Yeah you’re definitely a real user with no other motivations whatsoever. Fuck off shill
There are more protected classes than economic status and race at the federal level and some states have expanded classes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_group?wprov=sfti1#United_States
You cannot be removed from a jury ‘for no reason’. A judge may remove you from a jury if they believe a juror has bias or contact toward or with either the defendant. Or if the judge believes you are unwilling or incapable of following the law.
You can however be not selected for a jury via two means, a challenge for cause or a peremptory challenge. A challenge for cause is when the lawyer believes you have a genuine prejudice or bias against the defendant. A peremptory challenge is where lawyers can basically ask a judge to remove any juror from the selection pool, they only get a set number of these and they can’t violate the protected classes mentioned earlier, but they can be muuuuuch more loosely applied during proceedings.
IANAL I just spent a few min researching and watched that one cgp video about jury nullification a while back. And voir dire is fun to say.