ᥫ᭡ 𐑖ミꪜᴵ𝔦 ᥫ᭡

  • 2 Posts
  • 42 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 26th, 2024

help-circle




  • Oh, Are you the same Blender Dumbass 2.0 ?

    And only if surveillance actually stops all the crime ( which it doesn’t )

    When mass surveillance works, you lose your rights, and when it doesn’t work as intended ( which as the government says to protect you from terrorists ), it gets things wrong and it can be too damaging, like when Google flagged a man who sent his child’s photos to a doctor, or when Facial recognition system gets the wrong person, or when a bank algorithm locks someone of their own account due to suspicious activity… etc

    So we’re damned when it works and we’re damned when it doesn’t.

    Edit: how can I do the math? Do you have any links…



  • Exmuslim here, it’s forbidden in Islam to spy on people ( invade their privacy ), but there is another rule ( which is not actually written, at least not in the main scriptures ), that basically flips everything around, lying, stealing, killing, invading someone else privacy… etc everything becomes allowed, because it’s a necessity… now you might be asking, how and when you know it’s a necessity to do something that’s officially forbidden by Allah ( in this case invading others privacy ) ?

    the answer is… it’s subjective, you just make up your own mind, and justify it with : it’s a necessity, may Allah forgive me 🥺👉👈

    Of course, I’m being too optimistic, religion is there so people don’t use their brains, in reality people ask imams ( our version of priests ) who have authority because “they know” these stuff, it’s just makes life easier

    push users to register VPNs with the state’s media regulator, ostensibly to enhance cybersecurity and fight terrorism.

    Ahh, the terrorism excuse, ok… define terrorism ?!

    again, their own sharia laws are against them…lol…, Invading people’s privacy is prohibited in Islam, so They’re going out of their way, and against the word of their holy Prophet

    “Using VPNs to access blocked or illegal content is against Islamic and social norms, therefore, their use is not acceptable under Islamic law. It falls under ‘abetting in sin,’ ” said the statement, quoting the council’s chairman, Raghib Naeemi.

    man, don’t you just love it when religious people try to save you from eternal hell?











  • AFAIK he’s reliable when it comes to facts

    he does have some facts, he only shares the ones that suites his narrative, what kind of journalism is that?! journalism is about following the truth no matter where it goes… but he doesn’t do that, he just misquotes people and say : “see, they said that, what awful people”

    for example, in a recent video he made about the EFF he said that they support kids looking at porn, but off course they never said that, they said they’re against ID’ing people who watch porn, because that’s a serious threat to online anonymity…

    Also in a recent video about the EFF he literally made statements they never made, it was so obvious that one of his loyal conservative fans called him out on it

    surprised he didn’t shadowban this comment, quot

    … My default position is that any software-based organization is going to be run by libtards, but your accusations simply don’t line up with the articles. “If you have the wrong politics, you should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, that’s their repeated stance they’ve stated over and over”. Links please “If you’re a Republican … and happened to be standing outdoors on that day, you should be in jail. That’s the EFF’s stance.” Again, links please"

    to Lunduke as long as he’s getting push back from the left leaning individuals in these groups, then he must be on the right path, that’s how bias works not truth