![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Damn, five figures. Nice! 912800 here.
I had the app on my phone, just to check in on my friendslist. None of them had logged on since about 2004 or so, at the latest.
@Kichae@kbin.social @Kichae@tenforward.social @Kichae@kitchenparty.social
Damn, five figures. Nice! 912800 here.
I had the app on my phone, just to check in on my friendslist. None of them had logged on since about 2004 or so, at the latest.
It’s not. It’s obliged to work in the shareholders’ interests. That can mean many things.
The board just chooses to take a narrow interpretation of those interests.
Honestly the most impressive part of LLMs is the tokenizer that breaks down the request, not the predictive text button masher that comes up with the response.
Yes, exactly! It’s ability to parse the input is incredible. It’s the thing that has that “wow” factor, and it feels downright magical.
Unfortunately, that also makes people intuitively trust its output.
It “knows” as in it has access to the information and the ability to provide the right info for the right context.
It doesn’t, though, any more than you have access to the information in a pile of 10 million shredded documents.
Every community needs moderators it seems and here it seems they need to be KDE contributors
Those don’t really seem like related skillsets. Community managers aren’t usually asset contributors.
Self-promotion is not charity. And neither is putty porn. It’s just the cost of doing business when you’re your own brand. And philanthropy is a scam promoted by the rich to help justify their wealth hoarding.
All of it ultimately ends up personally furthering the rich person’s personal goals. It’s all just a way of saying that the rich deserve to determine what society goals should be, and how society should use its limited resources.
It’s taking control away from the masses, and keeping it in the hands of those with money.
The person one responds to isn’t always the audience for the response.
Leaving harmful public opinions unchallenged presents the illusion of widespread agreement.
The thing is, what a politically engaged person thinks of as “politics” and what a disengaged one does probably has limited overlap. People probably aren’t bringing the Tories or the Republicans up in a D&D community, but bring up race portrayal or representation for disabled people and watch the sparks fly.
Some of my main communities didn’t take hold here, so I keep my toes in those subreddits. In the past week, the experience has gotten measurably worse. It’s wild.
I wish those communities had reached a critical mass here.
Someday.
Commerce isn’t the same as things being for-profit. And, indeed, workers getting paid is the primary thing that cuts into profits.
Wages aren’t “personal profits”. The idea that they are is a lie the ownership class has been selling for generations.
Profits are what you get paid for owning property, not for doing work.
Saying they tried is the whole point. All too often, bills like this just don’t get reintroduced once the party is in power, though.
It’s all about show.
This is the kind of bill oppositions always propose, but never prioritize once they’re in government.
From the business side of things, it’s not weird at all.
These people are the ones who have already demonstrated a willingness to pay.
Credit where credit is due, if we define a generation as a 15 year period of time, and we decide that Gen Z started in 1995 (for easy math), you do, in fact, land on 1665.
I don’t know why the author thinks that Gen D doesn’t exist yet, when the pattern of X, Y (Millennials), and Z make a pattern that both implies that the Latin alphabet’s use is coming to an end for this purpose (ignoring that Gen X was named not as part of a sequence of letters, but by Douglas Copeland’s book, which was titled itself using an existing phrase), and that can easily be extrapolated backwards through time.