They probably pulled the article since it was bullshit, based on the other comments.

Virtucon (Dr Evil’s org in Austin Powers)

I’m using Voyager and the search function is awesome. I stopped using Jerboa a long time ago and I don’t remember exactly why.

Where are you searching?

!playstation@lemmy.world

Pretty sure it says “Have you tried turning it off and on again?”

It’s hard to understand without the associated hand gestures though.

(Edit to add in seriousness: yes, the first part says it can’t pop up the integrated flash, second part says try restarting the camera, I think)

Yo momma tried reading a book but she so fat she ate it as a snack instead.

Good point.

The author of this article, smh…

Sounds like the guy I want to be running emergency management!

Xitter. Xitter xitter xitter.

(pronounced shitter)

They have an “attack flow” diagram that seems to indicate a hacker installing it directly through a known vulnerability.

Good point! If vehicles are communicating like that, which I’ve always thought would be the ultimate for efficiency, you’d have to protect against poison pills. That would be even more difficult with disparate systems cooperating.

Reminds me of the car “chase” scene in I, Robot.

I wonder if this could be a step in the direction of forcing manufacturers to allow custom/open source/audited software in all vehicles. If it can be done in some foreign-made vehicles, it can be done in domestically made ones too.

Also note that it says “connected and autonomous vehicles”. If that means two categories, “connected vehicles” and “autonomous vehicles”, it could be quite broadly applied to vehicles that download updates over the air. If it means “autonomous vehicles that are connected” it could be somewhat narrow and an easy work around is to leave the autonomous vehicles disconnected from the internet. I’m not sure how much self-driving abilities are run on servers?

Top level comment is talking about using it for learning. Saying that AI is just regurgitating text doesn’t address that fact at all. In fact it sounds like you were putting down the commentor for using it for learning.

The bulk of your comment was about how poorly it writes code which isn’t what that comment was talking about. At all. So yes, I agree, you should have separated your two thoughts and probably focused the second thought on a different thread within this post. Perhaps at the top level to say it to the OP.

That isn’t what the comment you replied to was talking about so that’s why you’re getting downvoted even though some of what you said is right.

Tiktok is probably used 10 times as much though (users x time on the app) and Temu isn’t spreading messages in quite the same way. Comparing apples and gerbils, whataboutism, etc.

Perhaps, but the point was to indicate OP’s odd assumptions about this community vs the videos one.

Maybe you need flair for the technology community?

Yeah, I went by the examples in the text, not the title :)

I think that’s what OP did mean given the examples.