That would be true for the 2000 election as well, but Democrats didn’t fight the SC decision and so we got two expensive wars in the subsequent 8 years that some democrats even supported, demonstrating their fascist sympathies.

Lemmy is full of people who want to actually discuss ways to have a better world, unlike you it seems lmao.

You’re trying to argue the status quo to people who saw what the status quo was since Reagan, but you still don’t get it.

I’m so glad my consistent votes for democrats over my life have definitely not lead me to the precipice of fascism… oh wait.

I was reading into this recently and the reason Florida is so high on these lists is because post-secondary education is very cheap. Their K-12 education is on the garbage end of the spectrum.

You’re doing god’s work in the hellish trenches

They are both things to aspire to, but you’re right in that one does not lead to the other.

I’m gonna go with the blanket statement of:

If it’s getting in the way of your executive functions then it’s too much. If it takes any precedent over other things that you deem are your responsibility, then you need to take a step back.

This is an article from 2018 that is very likely to repeat next year

Ain’t that just the way

At what point is that just acceptance of their shitty policies? Is that too passive of a stance?

This is humorous to me because they’re banning Isreal from a “War” convention for doing the thing that almost always comes with war, genocide, and what Israel argues it is doing, war.

It’s more complicated than that I know, but something about this is making me laugh.

I’ve read the guy you’re responding to and don’t understand where you’re coming from. What made you think OP doesn’t think they deserve better than a two party system? That seems like a heavy assumption.

Are you morally grandstanding about how shit the two party system is? I think we all agree it’s shit, but it’s (currently) backed up by a US social contract (the average citizen agrees to the authority of the system), has a monopolization of violence behind it, and is the system that exerts power on people in and outside of the US.

Not participating in the system with the monopoly on violence seems like a bad decision because it’s more likely to make you a victim of that violence w/o any impact on the system itself, e.g. martyrdom.

Alternatively I have not heard of a good movement that’s poised to take power from the current system before November, which was the subject of OP’s post, so I don’t know where you’re coming from with such hostility towards a random comment lmao.

I’m going to take the position that misinformed actions or stances still make a trashy person. I understand animals harming humans needing to be put down, however that does not seem to be the case (?)

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/kristi-noem-dog-killing-story-worse-context.html

She killed a dog because it pissed her off. It was a poorly trained dog. I also understand dogs that won’t listen pissing you off, but I know if I killed a dog in the same way my farmer/country friends would crucify me.

This is a story you don’t state with pride. She stated this story with pride which is baffling, but it makes a little more sense if you take the reductionist view that she’s stating, with pride, that she is willing to kill things that don’t listen, work her desired way, or are untrained and “irredeemable.”

Coming from someone with ambitions to be a fascists VP, that’s horrifying.

Almost 40% of South Dakotans are trash.

Of course Republicans would have a worse name for the airport which is an astronomically low bar lmao. The Dulles brothers (whichever one the airport is named after) should not have an airport in their name because they were monsters that helped establish the CIA as a piece of shit organization.

Name is after some local wildlife or something.

The states themselves are beautiful, they’re just run by the trashiest people in the US

I appreciate that they included as much information as they did to really solidify their points.

Man it’s almost like state policies have long-term consequences

the only way to stop this is having the GOP lose over and over and over again.

This is asking a lot imo. You’re asking everyone to be vigilant and I think the last 10 years have proven that a significant proportion of the voter population cannot be relied on to be vigilant, because they’re content in being myopic.

That seems to be the weak point of a republic. I just watched a video essay on YouTube about the politics of Star Wars and how the Republic fell to the Empire and I think the guy made a lot of good points and it included a call to action in our elections. I think Star Wars is known to have taken from the fall of the Roman Republic and there’s more recent examples of the death of a democracy in the Weimar Republic in Germany.

With the two real life examples, all it took was a prolonged period of decay (from inside and outside factors) to lead to the Roman Autocratic Empire and Nazi Germany. I’d argue the US was on this relative path before with the America First party that rose to oppose FDR in the 1930’s. All it may take is another bad world event to push people into being content with a populist autocrat like Trump.

I’m still hopeful, but we should all take the lessons of the past into account when deciding how to move forward.

I wouldn’t necessarily call it integrity. I think Faux News has realized they created a monster that lost them a ton of viewers to even worse garbage at Newsmax. They’re trying to walk it all back now.

What kind of news site uses a pre-law student at a university for a quote? Article was alright until that point. That’s some Fox News level garbage.

You’re told that by people who cite their own stupidity for the argument.