Hey, I know we’re dunking on Vance, but you should really try reading the Bible before making that claim. What you find might surprise you.

I watched the video man, christ.

That’s not them turning on Trump. That’s them being so conditioned to cheer for anything they hear on stage that they’re just mindlessly cheering. You can’t honestly think they’re wanting to impeach Trump, come on man, there’s no way you’re that fucking stupid to believe that.

They aren’t turning on him. He’s not on shaky ground. You people are damn fools I’d you believe that.

deleted by creator

And everyone alive is “full of” radioactive waste from nuclear bomb tests in the 60’s. And by “full of” I mean, technically detectable by extremely precise scientific equipment but in such small quantities that it has zero effect on the organism and is measured by the number of molecules present rather than even something small like micrograms.

I love that the article completely avoids answering any of the obvious questions that people would have.

No mention of how he was driving.

No mention of how he shot the passenger.

Not even a mention of how he plays cornhole.

I get trying to be sensitive toward people with disabilities and not highlight them, but come on! If the man wasn’t a quadruple amputee, this wouldn’t even be an article. Address the elephant!

In a similar vein, what are you supposed to call aunts/uncles that are non-binary?

Ok wait… Can I use AI to change clickbait headlines into actual summaries of articles, without hyperbole, or people getting “slammed”? I am sure googles goal is only to create more clickbait, but if there was a way to do the opposite, that would be the first good use of AI I’ve seen.

Why does that photo look so off? I’m leaning toward not AI, but it also doesn’t look like a real protest. More like a stock photo or a staged photoshoot.

I was worried for a moment until I realized they’re talking about smart dashcams.

No shit Sherlock. Why the fuck would you buy a smart dashcam unless you were a fucking idiot who thinks every electronic needs to be connected to the internet?

Why wouldn’t he be as dirty as the man mentioned in the redacted Epstein files 38,000 times? Why wouldn’t he be as dirty as the man who is literally running underage sex clubs? Do you know that Mar A Lago still employs 16 year olds as masseuses and cocktail waitresses? That never actually stopped. That’s still going on. Underage girls giving gross old men full body massages. Clinton is a sonofabitch, but there is an ocean of difference between him and Trump.

Shh, there’s no room for rationality here! Obviously the US military, which is the biggest funded military in the world by several degrees, is collapsing because they’re all big, mean, stupid, poo-poo heads and no other reason! Everyone knows the US is minutes away from collapse and absolutely doesn’t have the strength to draw this conflict out for multiple decades despite the trillions of dollars spent to ensure exactly that outcome!

They also are often used as performance pieces. A politician introducing a bill that is doomed to failure is not helpful, nor does it accomplish anything.

“Oh but it’s important that they introduce them so that when congressmen vote no we have a record and-”

Shut. The. Fuck. Up. If I have to hear the “important to have a record” argument again I’m gonna scream. It is not important to have a record because the record doesn’t mean shit. We’ve had records going back decades, it doesn’t sway people in any meaningful way and it’s foolish to pretend it does.

Pesto base, grilled chicken, cashews, red onions, sun-dried tomatoes.

Can someone set me straight on Pizzagate? Like, sure what it evolved into was BS, with people storming a pizza parlor looking for non-existent basements. But… I mean fuck, look at the emails in the Epstein files, compare them with the Podesta emails…

Are we really trying to say that “pizza” WASN’T being used as code between high-profile individuals in Washington? People still bring up Pizzagate as if it were all conspiracy nonsense, but I’m sitting here reading actual emails between grown adults high up in politics who are salivating over the thought of sharing fresh, young pizza and being VERY particular about the toppings. Not to mention the other foods that are talked about in a similar batshit crazy way (jerky, tuna/sushi, pink/black shrimp, etc.).

Normal people do not talk about food like this. And at its core, wasn’t Pizzagate about high-profile individuals using pizza as a code to traffic children? While there is no smoking gun (yet) that proves pizza and other foods were 100% code for children… Come on. It’s clear they AREN’T just talking about food. And it’s all found smack dab in the middle of a global conspiracy that has a focus on trafficking minors!!

So, again, someone tell me WHY we’re still treating Pizzagate as completely debunked nonsense? The specifics at the end were wrong and the whole movement was likely taken over by controlled opposition by the end of things. But the core conspiracy? Are we just pretending there’s nothing there? Are people so disgusted by the idea that they are just preferring to call it debunked when it really hasn’t been? Has the opposition been successful in proliferating the narrative that only conspiracy theorists believe Pizzagate, and nothing conspiracy theorists believe is real? Why the fuck aren’t we talking about this more?!

I bring this up and people act like all they heard and saw was television static. How does this keep getting memory holed?!

In 1980, John Lennon was shot by a mentally ill man who was convinced to kill Lennon by reading Catcher in the Rye. If he had never read Catcher in the Rye, he most likely wouldn’t have killed John Lennon.

But it is not the fault of Catcher in the Rye. We don’t ban the book, or call the author irresponsible for writing it, because we recognize that the fault lies in the mental illness of the shooter, and that anything could have set him off.

The people who kill themselves because an AI Chatbot told them to are mentally ill. It is their mental illness that killed them, not the chatbot. You can make the claim that if it wasn’t for the chatbot, they wouldn’t have gone through with it, but again, you can say the same thing about Catcher in the Rye. Getting rid of the trigger does not remove the mental illness.

There is a lot to hate about AI. A lot of dangers and valid criticism. But AI chatbots convincing people to kill themselves isn’t a problem with chatbots, it’s a problem with the user.

I get it, grieving families will look for anything and anyone to blame for suicide except the victim, but ultimately, it is the victim who chose to kill themselves. If someone is convinced to kill themselves from something as stupid as an AI chatbot, they really weren’t that far from the edge to begin with.

Paper tags arent as easily damaged.

I’ve gotta wonder… How expensive are these little networked e-ink displays? Probably not super expensive, but they’ve gotta be more than a paper price tag. Definitely more of a hassle to replace when someone breaks them by running into them, accidentally snapping them off, etc…