The only sticker I have on my car is from a insurance that I’m not even subscribed to lol. I just like the design.
- 33 Posts
- 185 Comments
Joined 1 年前
Cake day: 2024年6月22日
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
2·17 天前Hamburg - nothing to write home about, but I’ve been to it in over a decade
Have you been to the “official” one in front of the City Hall or the one in the red-light district? The latter can certainly be an experience.
5·18 天前15% ist already an insane number considering the size of Reddit’s userbase.
TIL, I had no idea there were separate services.
The right app is org.torproject.torbrowser. You can also get it from the official site: https://www.torproject.org/download/#android
I wish I had your optimism but I genuinely expect nothing more than a strong condemnation at this point.
lol, lmao even
3·2 个月前That’s true of course. But they must be doing something right, because even their lower-priced models are pretty good. Last year I bought a 144Hz desktop monitor for a little more than 100€ and it’s been great so far.
Philips. I’ve had my last one for 15 years before it died and the picture still had better colors than my sister’s new ultra thin LG. Can’t say much about their newer models as I haven’t bought a new one yet, but I also use Philips monitors on my PC and I’m very happy with them.
When the EU’s former competition Commissioner, Margrethe Vestager, announced those preliminary findings she warned that the only effective remedy – should the violations be confirmed – would be for the EU to break up Google.
No other option would resolve the “inherent” conflict of interest flowing from Google’s dominance of all sides of the ad market, Vestager suggested two years ago.
Yes please.
What a ridiculous comparison.
I’m a bit confused by comments on this topic. Do sovereign countries not have the right anymore to decide their own laws and issue punishment when they’re not followed?
Some laws are bullshit and I commend everyone who decides to ignore them.
but if 4chan ignores them, that opens the door for other measures like delisting the site from search engines or blocking access to it from the UK (these two examples are taken from the article)
This has already happened to a number of sites and services, with some voluntarily blocking access from the UK. 4chan’s approach is just a bit different in the way that they are waiting to get blocked instead of doing the blocking themselves. It sucks for citizens from the UK, but they are the ones that put the people in power who created those laws.
Like, to the people saying UK can’t do laws which apply to services which are merely accessible in the UK and have no physical presence there, do you also apply this logic to the GDPR, which works the same way?
This has also been the case already. There are a number of American websites that will just straight up deny you access if you visit them from a EU country. Some even cite GDPR as the reason for being blocked. I don’t think it’s the best solution, but I accept it because I wouldn’t want to visit a site that cannot comply with it anyways.
I know people who were affected when a Windows 10 update just straight up deleted all personal files in 2020.
The problem with this specific conflict is that otherwise “reputable” news agencies are just repeating what their sources are saying because they cannot verify the details of what’s actually going on on the ground in Gaza. So you get shaky cellphone footage of some people getting shot and some humanitarian NGOs will publish that civilians are being murdered. A journalist writes an article about it. The Israeli military then publishes a statement that they killed some Hamas official and his henchmen. Another journalist writes an article about it. Both newspapers are usually credible sources that are accepted on Wikipedia. So what do you do? Who is actually right?