16-year employee not 16 years old

Swindled did too https://pca.st/episode/40fcefc5-c541-4e00-be64-7e6f624bd4b1

Cybertown. I miss it so much

https://youtu.be/maVaSlvnEto?is=_JGZ8xAeXgsf-tYs

Lol what. Besides the actual scientific tests and result analysis? No substance?

https://lemmyverse.link/sh.itjust.works/comment/26025689

Not seeing anywhere close to $15 for any of their models

Only a few settings on some updates, and then you just run your saved template and reboot and it’s back to normal Although I see there are some better minimal install options in the other comments

ShutUp10 has been my go-to for many years. (Yes it does 11 too)

https://www.oo-software.com/en/shutup10

deleted by creator

Here’s a safer solution. https://shop.neilmed.com/products/sinus-rinse-kit-with-50-packets

I use it fairly regularly because of bad allergies. It basically dissolves the snot. Weird feeling at first, but feels wonderful afterwards

Ah yes, delete your original incorrect comment instead of continuing the discussion about how wrong and lazy it was to make, nice.

Libmanwe-lib.so is a library file in machine language (compiled). A Google search reveals that it is exclusively mentioned in the context of PDD software—all five search results refer to PDD’s apps. According to this discussion on GitHub, “the malicious code of PDD is protected by two sets of VMPs (manwe, nvwa)”. Libmanwe is the library to use manwe.

An anonymous user uploaded a decompiled version of libmanwe-lib to GitHub. It reads like it is a list of methods to encrypt, decrypt or shift integer signals, which fits the above description as a VMP for the sake of hiding a program’s purpose.

In plain words, TEMU’s app employed a PDD proprietary measure to hide malicious code in an opaque bubble within the application’s executables

1. Dynamic compilation using runtime.exec(). A cryptically named function in the source code calls for “package compile”, using runtime.exec(). This means a new program is created by the app itself.—Compiling is the process of creating a computer executable from a human-readable code. The executable created by this function is not visible to security scans before or during installation of the app, or even with elaborate penetration testing. Therefore, TEMU’s app could have passed all the tests for approval into Google’s Play Store, despite having an open door built in for an unbounded use of exploitative methods. The local compilation even allows the software to make use of other data on the device that itself could have been created dynamically and with information from TEMU’s servers.

The study and evidence was already provided months ago

https://grizzlyreports.com/we-believe-pdd-is-a-dying-fraudulent-company-and-its-shopping-app-temu-is-cleverly-hidden-spyware-that-poses-an-urgent-security-threat-to-u-s-national-interests/

This was also linked in the article if you read it