In a critical environment the UPS only has to last as long as it takes to switch over to a backup generator.

Yeah, people that brag about uptimes are just bragging about the fragility of their infrastructure. If designed correctly you should be able to patch and reboot infrastructure while application availability stays up.

The only promise they made was that they would vote on it. They didn’t say they would vote for it.

It’s really not. They handle authentication but then everything is sent to your server.

Yeah, that has been my problem in the past. That’s why I settled on installing Wireguard and just toggle it on/off as needed. With it on it connects back to my home and my DNS.

The opposite is also a problem because I want to use my DNS when on my own network.

Quad9 has a couple different categories. There are others too, but Quad9 isn’t a for profit company and is probably the best option.

https://quad9.net/

Isn’t that a per network setting though?

Or AdGuard Home.

You don’t even need to be rooted these days. There are apps that basically route through a “vpn” on your device that does the same dns filtering.

A lot of companies. Don’t forget that IBM was ahead of the game with Watson and Watsonx. Also, don’t forget that Red Hat is owned by IBM and OpenShift is getting big in the AI space allowing GPUs to be pooled and workloads to be scheduled dynamically.

Sure but they’re in the business of consulting on how to build out that AI platform and the business of providing an AI platform.

Or, in this post fact era just generate a wiki with a hallucinating AI instead.

https://github.com/XanderStrike/endless-wiki

Honestly this project looks like a lot of fun.

This was my thought as well. Seems like a very thinly veiled antisemitic thing to say.

You keep trying to throw out all the data because some is bad. I don’t think these companies would be paying that much for all bad data. You seem to really want to justify some bias you have. It’s really weird.

At this point we’re just speculating. We don’t have evidence either way of its mostly good or mostly bad data.

No, I’m not. I don’t care at all if they’re successful or go under.

Sure, but again it’s not likely to be most. You don’t seem to realize how hard it is to get data that is already classified. That stuff is gold to people developing AI. Most of the work in data science is cleaning data and getting it into a usable form.

Okay, but it is those niche subs that are the most valuable.

Of course there are. That doesn’t mean the majority of the site is compromised.

No, it’s value is that users have up voted and down voted good and bad data. This gives the AI training data that has been crowd sourced by humans. Bots manipulating votes would destroy the value of Reddit.