![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
If a game developer can’t trust the platform you’re developing for, you probably should look to find better business partners.
If a game developer can’t trust the platform you’re developing for, you probably should look to find better business partners.
Right, and blockchain/NFT have nothing to do with that problem. Xbox could have implemented the exact same program without a blockchain, they just wanted the buzzword in the headline.
Because then they wouldn’t be able to evangelize NFTs. You see this constantly with crypto/NFT tech, a solution in search of a problem
What the fuck are you talking about? It doesn’t matter how many options you have for an exchange, as soon as you choose one you give the keys to the castle to another person. You have no idea who they are, if you should trust them, or what your recourse would be if they scammed you. But don’t worry the scary government won’t be involved at all. What a joke.
The second that people started using centralized crypto exchanges this argument went out the window. A third party has just as much control, with zero oversight isn’t that neat?
What are you smoking and where can I get some?
What do you mean? The US is switching to NACS which is a standardized plug, Tesla superchargers will not be the only charging network to use it.
They wouldn’t even need to license it, part of getting the other car manufacturers to switch to NACS was establishing it as an open standard. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Charging_Standard
Of course a lot of OEMs would like it, but google is incentivised to keep the best part of Android as pixel exclusives.
Why would it be in googles interest to provide better cameras to OEMs? Google has to love that people buy pixel phones because other vendors cameras are years behind
Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor