And if it was an even better product, billions would be using it. Mathematical!
And if it was an even better product, billions would be using it. Mathematical!
Humanity accepts your challenge! See y’all on the battlefield ;-)
Did some basic video editing in blender and was pleasantly surprised, did you give that a whirl?
Can i get a little Tristan Pinball up in here!?
Whenever we (Brother and I) broke our W95 install, it was a pretty high stakes race against the clock to get it to work as expected again, because if my dad got home from work and found out about the broken machine, there would be consequences (him being frustrated, us not allowed to play C&C red alert or Warcraft II)
Thanks a lot, this clarified this news article instantly for me!
https://jan.ai/ Jan works fine on W11
deleted by creator
But efficiency is not the only consideration, privacy and self reliance are important facets as well. Your argument about efficiënt computing is 100% valid but there is a lot more to it.
Never knew and that’s how spot on Mr. GMUNK had it, very impressed. Only saw it a gazillion.5 times so I never really had a chance.
Yeah but folding screens though. I was never that interested, but then I held one with my own eyes and I instant got the merit if it. I don’t need one, but if I had Beyonce money I would for sure want one.
I get that she is grappling with identity and it’s not a clear cut case, but if the precedent is set that similar voices (and I didn’t even think it was that similar in this case) are infringement, that would be a pretty big blow to commercial creativity projects.
Maybe it’s more a brand problem than an infringement problem.
If not trained on CSAM or in painted but fully generated, I can’t really think of any other real legal arguments against it except for: “this could be real”. Which has real merit, but in my eyes not enough to prosecute as if it were real. Real CSAM has very different victims and abuse so it needs different sentencing.
You could try a SearXNG someone hosted, it’s FOSS and not worse than Google :)
I guess everyone was right al along, that makes for a pretty boring article though 🤣
Yep, intra continental travel is what is left (for pleasure, I guess if you want to emigrate you could take a boat) That’s cool, I have seen like 2% of it. Maybe in 25 years, you won’t be obliged to share the image of your genitals if you want to travel by plane. Cross ocean travel is really cool and can expand your horizons, but I don’t really need it.
And where do the original scans get saved? And for how long? Who can access those? Can those images be resold? Can I request my personal data and request to have it removed?
I felt 100% violated when I had to go through a machine like this and haven’t felt like flying ever since, I’ll take the train thanks. When the kids couldn’t be scanned because that would constitue child porn, that’s where we should have scratched our head and maybe take a step back.
I own the image of my genitals and have exclusive rights to distribute them, not some TSA human I have never met before.
deleted by creator
That’s like saying a supermarket that’s burning to the ground is experiencing a record low theft.