The markdown you’re looking for is _underscores_
or *asterisks*
for emphasis.
The markdown you’re looking for is _underscores_
or *asterisks*
for emphasis.
Anything but fair compensation.
Let’s see how long we can laugh about America before everything is privatised to fuck because “iT wOrKs So WeLl In AmErIcA.”
Of course it is. It is trained on past decisions, which were predominantly terrible. As such, future decisions it will take will be, too.
As a result it works exactly as intended, making the same horrible decisions at a fraction of the cost of underpaid humans.
So much nomenclature in tech is watered down and obfuscated because we let marketing monkeys make decisions.
I fail to see how that is superior to the encryption provided by gpg.
So will they rename to closed captions?
It was a deliberate choice of words intended to reflect and emphasise what they might think of the average voter. But good looking out.
that is a very low effort and bad faith argument for what she is arguing for
Imagine rhetorically competent fascists. That’s terrifying!
The common rabble can’t see through their flimsy lies as is. They’d be completely out of their depth if republicans took even just an introductory class to discussion and rhetorics.
Burn more fossil fuels, nothing bad will ever come of it, it’s cheaper, and it lines the pockets of our sponsors
Fucking idiots
Yes, the compiler prevents from doing stupid shit.
They’re absolutely within their rights to try and block ad-blockers. And users are fully within their rights to circumvent the blocks in order to protect their privacy and the security of their machines and the data on them, as Google has proven repeatedly to be either uncaring or incompetent when it comes to ensuring the ads they serve aren’t spreading malware.
Just CUPS things.
Maybe speak correctly so you’re not a disappointment to them?
Without information what types of antibodies they are this isn’t worth much. Just means some cell recognised PEG as foreign, which is correct. As long as no immune response is triggered it’s merely something to keep an eye on.
In defense of the point made in the title (I didn’t read the article): in recent years it seems sex scenes were added just for the controversy. For the most part they don’t advance the plot or drive character development or exposition. They just give the entertainment magazines something to write about.
I mean, our cat is on Prozac. You might attribute that to her previous family declawing her front paws, then dropping her off at the SPCA after she developed litter box problems.
Because, you know, amputating her first digits on two paws might be sorta painful and make weird to walk around like you’re used to. And then they abandon you. I kinda understand there might be some anxiety.
Consumers of cannabis edibles, for example, are able to go online and find products with a potency [advertised] higher than the legal amount, Mr Smitherman said.
Addition by me. Because that is really the crux of the matter. Sure, you may see edibles advertised with 1000mg or something ridiculous, but there’s absolutely no guarantee you actually get what you pay for, without that regulatory oversight.
And then there’s the obviously flawed assumption that stronger = better.
But you’re running Debian, so it’ll be 2 years at least before you get it.