𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠

He’s significantly less Nazi when he’s on his meds, so it’s likely.

Except Windows does cater to it, and despite Linux’ supposed superiority it is still by far the dominant desktop OS.

That keeps out 90% of the population. Do not underestimate how complex that is to people who aren’t tech-savvy and who are used to “it just works”.

We’ve likely known about Parkinson’s since the 12th century, just never named it as such. But it’s very much possible that pollutants increase the risk.

Then you also mandate tri-monthly doctor’s appointments or something similar to check. Sounds horrible.

AI bros aren’t that smart.

To add to this, the university decided to suspend him. The court did also order him to pay a fine to the victim.

There’s no physical reason for it, it’s mostly inexperience that can cause it.

Relax, do foreplay, lube up. Don’t push it, take it slow. Won’t be any different from any other time.

Of course, there are exceptions to this. But these are rarer than most people think.

No, it specifically talks about US lend-lease and the invasion of Europe. It’s not talking about the entire western contribution to the war.

The US army says that lend-lease and the invasion of Europe shortened the war. It does not say that the Soviets would have won without the Allies being in the war. Even your source says that the lend-lease and the invasion, even if not the deciding factor, were “a great help”.

Maybe read your sources a little better?

The Axis combined conscripted approximately 40 million men, whereas the Soviet Union conscripted approximately 34.5 million men. Without the Allies they would not have won just looking at the numbers.

The US conscripted 16 million, the British Commonwealth approximately 11 million. That’s a combined 27 million, which isn’t exactly insignificant compared to the USSRs 34.5 million (see https://www.statista.com/statistics/1342260/wwii-mobilization-by-country/).

The Soviets were forced to mobilize that many as they were essentially fighting an existential war at that time. They also suffered the brunt of the casualties, in no small part due to a lack of equipment.

Without the Allies, the USSR would have likely lost. Even Stalin knew and said as much. The US entry shortened the war but they certainly didn’t “win the war for the rest of the Allies” or anything. But to minimize the contribution as a “pinprick” is ridiculous and not supported by historians east nor west.

Because the US and UK did nothing else during the war except lend-lease of course. The bombing of German industry, blockades of their supply lines, the Africa-campaigns, extensive intelligence operations, no all of that definitely did nothing and didn’t contribute to the war effort at all.

It’s likely the Allies would have won the war without the US involved, though it’s estimated it would have taken much longer. Without UK involvement, it’s more probable that the Germans could have achieved a victory, though perhaps not a total capitulation of the Soviets. Without a western front to guard as heavily, they would probably have taken Moscow by the end of 41 (irl they were 20 miles out). Japan would also have a much freeer reign in the pacific theatre.

It’d be hilarious if Peru deports him back to the US.

What do you think a bog is?

Yup. When a right-wing government asks, he complies. When a left-wing government does, he sues.

Morocco and Egypt are pretty well developed.

deleted by creator

QUANTUM AI? IN my blockchain? It’s more likely than you think!

How the fuck did that thing ever become road legal. I think in some countries it even straight up isn’t iirc.

Rheinmetall was founded in 1889. The NSDAP was founded after the 1st world war. There’s literally no way Nazis founded Rheinmetall because it predates Nazism by about thirty years.