Ha, I had basically the same bug (functionally) in GNOME a few months back. Moving the mouse off the screen scrolled it around.

The top left was anchored at least so it was easy to reset.

Within my company there is a mix of Scrum and Kanban, so Agile != Scrum.

I don’t think it makes much sense to say “We are switching from Agile to Kanban”, but “We are switching from Scrum to Kanban” does make sense (at least to me)

Kanban is Agile. They are pushing Impact Engineering.

elon cant run for pres anyway, he wasnt born in the US.

Last time I observed this I was getting the exact same item that I bought being advertised to me constantly, across multiple sites. No variation at all. It was a pair of hiking shoes. If it had then offered me hiking poles or rain coats or anything else that would have been useful, but instead it was the same pair of shoes I had already purchased.

If the ad network had actually suggested useful paired items that i dont already own, then those ads should actually stand out, as they are actually relevant to me.

If its not cost efficient to actually target to the individual (and I dont doubt that it isn’t), im not sure what Paypal is bringing to the table here that Amazon etc can’t already do.

I’m sure thats the theory, and whats being sold to the ad buyers, but my money is on it ending up like the ads you get after buying something from amazon/ebay: same item you just bought.

That would be actually valuable for consumers and advertisers. Shame its impossible.

Has it worked? Its never led to a repeat purchase for me. :/

So, advertising the things I have already bought? Not sure thats gonna be super successful…

True, if the LLM is training on those legal documents. Less true if its trained on whatever random garbage was scrapped out of reddit.

At least this time the Rep. was actually reviewing the output, so thats responsible at least.

Cyber security companies report on APTs all the time, nothing unusual about that.

What is worrying about Google being involved with this report? They have an internet security division, this is exactly their job?

Are you thinking rowhammer? My understanding is limited, but doesnt rowhammer require being able to write to memory at a consistent address, co-located with the data being attacked? Im not sure thats doable with tmpfs, but probably worth an investigation by someone more knowledgable than me :)

I think, and i’m open to alternative theories, is that using RAM instead of disk is safer when the tmp directory fills up.

If you have /tmp being a regular directory on your root drive, if you fill your disk witg tmp files, other processes wont be able to save files to disk, resulting in lost data.

If you have it in a ram disk, when the tmpfs fills up too much, the oom killer can get more space (unsure if oomkiller can wipe tmpfs, but that probably would be ideal?).

Neither are good, and both can result in data loss, but tmpfs may be safer?

Arch uses tmpfs for /tmp by default as well. At least on my.install from 2-3 years ago

To be fair, we only know of this one. There may well be other open source backdoors floating around with no detection. Was heartbleed really an accident?

deleted by creator

Sure, but the problem is that you dont want to make safety equipment more expensive, as it encourages cheaping out and cutting corners. People already buy cheap and nasty tires that dont grip well or stop well (but still meet roadworthiness), its best to avoid further encouraging that.

There is no reason not to just directly tax against the weight of the car, as defined by the manufacturer. There already is a yearly rego payments, just scale that directly against weight.

A direct tax is also clear and obvious. If someone has a large car, the rego weight tax will clearly show they are paying more. Making tires more expensive just gets rolled into the price of the tire, which are already moderately expensive, so its easier to just rationalise it and ignore it.

Yeah, it really is. On the upside, if you get rejected from a company that doesnt even have the time to manually review your CV, that might be a blessing in disguise.

Have they? There is the air canada thing, but that was kinda a different situation, the chat bot was explicitly acting for the company, and made direct claims for the company?

IANAL, but proving discrimination was already hard, and now they can just point at the black box and blame it, so its gonna get harder?