![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4271bdc6-5114-4749-a5a9-afbc82a99c78.png)
As a presenter would be mortified.
As an attendee, hilarious.
As a presenter would be mortified.
As an attendee, hilarious.
Sounds like Nevada!
Criss-Cross!!!
That’s not really Forbes serving the malvertising intentionally. If your site hooks into a programmatic advertising stack, the risk of malware exists. This is from 2016, but it’s mostly true today. If a user is blocking ads and cookies and they disable their ad blocker on a specific site only, there’s little data to know about that user. So you get low $CPM on the bid which is mainly where the malicious ads win bids on actual quality sites. That’s why most top sites are very strict on who can bid nowadays.
I don’t see how it could be enforced without this. If you are operating internationally, comply or block your service from regions you cannot legally operate in.
Personally I don’t think Lemmy should comply. It’s an ad free community service with zero PII obligation besides an email and whatever IP you choose to connect from. No one has to be on Lemmy for any common social obligations.
If you want to be forgotten then leave!
Limited view tickets were $1500 a piece when TS came to Levi stadium. Bonkers
What does Hungary stand to gain in a defeat of Ukraine?
What’s the identifier referenced in the IMDB database? Some kind of unique content id?
I think doing that with programmatic ads would be difficult. Maybe hard coding a specific creative would be feasible.
Randos on Twitter left negative comments with little to no substantive feedback. Fire up the article!
What would you use this feature for?