This isn’t going to hurt Google’s antitrust cases at all… Noooo sir.
This isn’t going to hurt Google’s antitrust cases at all… Noooo sir.
The joke is that, regardless of how the type is declared in json, you are parsing a string. (your json blob is just a series of characters, not raw binary data)
Tell that to the CDC and who when giving COVID guidance during the pandemic. 😡
The reply would have been return x % 2 == 0
, or if you wanted it to be less readable return !(x&1)
.
But if you were going for a way that is subtly awful or expensive, just do a regex match on “[02468]$”. You don’t get a stack overflow with larger numbers but I struggle to think of a plausible bit of code that consumes more unnnecessary cycles than that…
Is this meant to be a joke or is it intended to be a serious solution?
Asking for someone who lacks a sense of humor.
Ok, fine, I’m asking for me. That person is me.
Afterwards they will complain that they lost their jobs because they are being persecuted for their political beliefs.
They also won’t be able to tell you if Microsoft has plans to deport you to Mars.
A more cynical person might suggest they are doing this BECAUSE of that. Biden can’t run on the numbers if Texas keeps blocking action.
Perhaps you just need to learn what gossip is.
The lite, being the cheapest model in that line, unsurprisingly only supports 2x2 mimo. Getting 600mbps from that is actually really good, but given net bandwidth is nearly identical to what is available for wifi5 I’m not surprised you didn’t see much of a difference.
An ap with 4x4 mimo would substantially outpace your wifi 5 router.
They’re is so much wrong here I don’t know where to start.
get a better wifi 6ap. You should be getting about 2x the bandwidth. I get about 900mbps on my 5 year old cell phone sitting on the couch.
Wi-Fi 7 smaller width channels to avoid interference. Pretty much everything you’ve said here is backwards/wrong and i encourage you to do some learning on your own.
Yes, you can legally make derivative works, but without license, it has to be fair use. In this case, where not only did they use one whole work in its entirety, they likely scraped thousands of whole NYT articles.
Scraping is the same as reading, not reproducing. That isn’t a copyright violation.
They will never stfu. The lack of evidence is just further proof of a giant conspiracy to these folks.
I liked it a lot better when the conspiracy theory nutjobs treated the x-files as a documentary and were convinced the government was hiding evidence aliens were among us.
You might not, but if you look around plenty of people do. Including the subject of this story.
With all of the violence going on in the world today, I am constantly surprised at how little of it is directed towards insurance company offices.
I’ve met more mature 7 year olds.
That’s the whole point. Unless you are a dog you don’t hear it. Otherwise it would just be a normal whistle…
Omg, I have SOOoo many questions about what is going on in this picture.
They’re supposed to be good a transformation tasks. Language translation, create x in the style of y, replicate a pattern, etc. LLMs are outstandingly good at language transformer tasks.
Using an llm as a fact generating chatbot is actually a misuse. But they were trained on such a large dataset and have such a large number of parameters (175 billion!?) that they passably perform in that role… which is, at its core, to fill in a call+response pattern in a conversation.
At a fundamental level it will never ever generate factually correct answers 100% of the time. That it generates correct answers > 50% of the time is actually quite a marvel.