[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0
Google Quantum AI founder Hartmut Neven wrote in his blog post that this chip was so mind-boggling fast that it must have borrowed computational power from other universes.
The linked HackerNews thread speculates that the relevant comment was tongue-in-cheek.
haha no. i meant the examples of trolling i provided lol, not you.
Calling someone zionist is not a slur. Calling someone a bot is also not a slur. Both are thought-terminating cliches. Also, by thread, I meant including the comments as well. Plus you have the trolling.
There’s outright lying, this thread of what I can only describe as trolling, chanting “what about clinton’s blowjob” on a post asking for people to debunk a list of bad things Reagan did, and there’s a ton of calling everyone Zionists within the very thread I linked to. Such spreading of vitriol at everyone he disagrees with is definitely bannable IMO.
since the guy is also a stonks AI tech bro it appears this was a reason some on the far-right didn’t want trump to be on the joe rogan podcast
I sure agree, ChihuahuaOfDoom
The discussion here shows me that linkerbaan’s ban was the right decision: https://p.lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/lemmy.dbzer0.com/29384791 . Please provide receipts of actual attempted Orwellianism.
That people create blocklists that become popular absolutely does not prove endorsement of a potential official blocklist. While an official, default blocklist may be Orwellian, unofficial opt-in blocklists that require searching for are not Orwellian at all. One knows they’re there, one chooses to block them. Your line of reasoning leads to arguing against the block feature entirely. And what’s wrong with providing transparent statistics?
For all the great enforcement problems KOSPA has, at least it incorporated Filter Bubble Transparency…
I think you’ve been in an echo chamber for too long.
I assure you that official blocklists are a very fringe viewpoint.
The vanguard party is essentially an oligarchy. It chooses its own successors, and we’re supposed to trust that they are too smart and on the lookout for the populace to not abuse power selfishly. A core tenet of anarchism is that while people may hold authority, nobody should hold positions of power.
Though I would say that while quite corrupt, one-party, and authoritarian, Cuba is a lot more democratic than people think
…is this my time to self-promote? 👉👈
certain offerings like MS’s cite their sources inline. i always use it to find those sources and then read it from the sources.
In response to your edits:
Have you actually read your replies?
Yeah, by “posts” I meant posts to Lemmy/threads on the home feed. By “comments” I mean the discussion area for each thread.
That’s for posts, not comments, which is what Bluesky changed.
I get that I may be getting wooooshed, but TechCrunch nearly exclusively covers tech tech (and, uh, gaming for some reason), which that entire thing is not a part of.