Why not password protect the keys (ala Linux ssh / gpg symmetric encryption for local storage of PPK)

Turbine should connect to loudspeaker to make this a closer system lol

Half the time I look on stack overflow it feels like the answer is irrelevant by todays standards

Yes let’s take the one thing the state famously does right and make it have the same problem every other state does.

Are you a bot lol. Colorado is weird but it votes for president primary during Super Tuesday but other positions have their primary in June. I do think Ken buck resigned to make it as inconvenient as possible for boebert. The party gets to pick the candidate for the primary, and she has to resign to run. They could manipulate her into resigning and not pick her to run lol I do feel like he is intentionally trying to sabotage her

Governor called a special election to coincide with the date of the primary in June. So the parties will pick two candidates and then CO-4 will pick a house rep for 6 months and then another election for a full term in November. The real question is if it means bobo the clown will leave her current seat to run which would mean two special elections. But first the party has to nominate her

He already announced a while back he wasn’t running for re-election, but who knows maybe he just didn’t see the point to keep going.

SpaceX actually did use some kind of TS/JS chrome browser thing for their docking controls lol…

Guess what? Flight Software usually uses ancient proprietary compilers for specialized hardware running an RTOS, rip 😢

That’s not old you’re good.

Colorado didn’t declare every state is required to take it off. It decided to take his name off their ballot. I don’t get the argument. It’s true if enough states do it it has a national outcome but so what? That is deciding it nationally. States decide how to run their own elections, I don’t know why states rights aren’t being claimed here given how popular that move usually is lol.

It’s also only the largest plurality because it’s the default bucket. When you lump religious vs non religious the picture is very different

It is a little bit of a contradiction and I had a hard time following the logic. But your post made me think of something else. If you have one extremist candidate by definition you have two, because from the perspective of the followers of the atypical extremist candidate (a trump like figure) status quo will be an extreme for them

If you knew the reference you’d know it’s making fun of the MCU / Disney

Catch 22 and nullified by Russia’s own promise of not only non aggression but guarantee of defense

The problem with this comment is some people could say this word for word with zero irony lol

Doomerism encourages apathy and helplessness. I don’t agree with resigning ourselves that the situation is unfixable. Every .1 degrees we can shave off is worth fighting tooth and nail for. As far as whether humanity as a whole is sustainable indefinitely, I don’t buy it. Even if we run out of rare earth metals 1000 years from now that’s 1000 years we have to fix that problem.

The universe is unsustainable, life is inherently doomed because of entropy. Doesn’t mean we should give up because there will be no usable energy in 100 trillion years or whatever. The sun will burn out in a billion, the earths orbit will be too hot in 100 million. Would that still not be worth living for just because it can’t be saved? Where does it go from no point to worth fighting for?

(OP I’m not arguing with you I’m pointing out the problems I have with the article. I do agree it’s gonna be bad no matter what… all the more reason to try)

I don’t think this is totally accurate. There’s a point to be made sure but nobody knows for sure what will happen.

An oversimplification but Imagine you have an algebraic math function where every word in English can be assigned a number.

x+y+z=n where x y z are the three words in a sentence. N is the next predicted word based on the coefficients of the previous 3.

Now imagine you have 10 trillion coefficients instead of 3. That’s an LLM, more or less. Except it’s done procedurally and there’s actually not that many input variables (context window) just a lot of coefficients per input

+1 90% of apps people use are web browsers or native apps that still require internet to function. Fighting the good fight is gonna take a lot more than a few bored devs taking on a desktop Linux side project or two. Unfortunately accomplishing and keeping up with the scope, utility, and usability that freedom violating proprietary applications provide requires the resources and hierarchy of a large organization. We need well funded non profit organizations and government sponsored free software more than we need a few weekend GitHub contributors pushing PRs to their 56 star library. (As much as I, a developer, love and appreciate those 56 star libraries)