• irdc@derp.foo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Though I really like the concept of building a new device which incorporates the inherent ease of programmability of the computers of yore, I think the 6502 is just too weird and limited for doing so. For example, in order to cram a halfway decent amount of memory into the thing they had to resort to bank switching. At the least they should’ve gone with a 65816 (apparently they tried but they initially had some problems with the '816 address bus multiplexing).

    • feoh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, how would that ‘weirdness’ impact using the device in a teaching context?

      • irdc@derp.foo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        People would learn bad habits.

        For example, due to parameter passing often being done via the zero page, recursion is unnecessarily hard on the 6502, whereas one could argue that recursion is one of the major skills to master for any programmer.

        • Richard@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @irdc @feoh All programmers need to learn recursion and fully understand it so when they encounter it in the wild they can properly analyze what it is doing and replace it with non-recursive code.