• wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    If the law only references federal definitions of scheduled drugs, they would need to update their laws before this went into effect or else risk letting the population have legal weed for a short window, which likely would spur voters to try and regain their newly found drug

    • urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Right, which is why I bothered to link Texas law, which references by name.

      My own state references it by name. I suspect many/most state marijuana laws predate the formation of the DEA but I’m not a historian/lawyer.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sure texas is covered, but we got a lot of states. A ton are going to need proactive laws or else risk kicking a hornets nest in an election year