The HDMI Forum, responsible for the HDMI specification, continues to stonewall open source. Valve’s Steam Machine theoretically supports HDMI 2.1, but the mini-PC is software-limited to HDMI 2.0. As a result, more than 60 frames per second at 4K resolution are only possible with limitations.

  • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The people who block HDMI for Linux are also the people who make TVs and other media stuff. So you may not be able to use displayport or hdmi just because some rich people decided so to make more profit.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is what I said the other day about this issue. Good luck finding a decent tv with display port! Those fuckers are rare and expensive!

      • Routhinator@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        They are called monitors, and yeah expensive but then you don’t get a “Smart TV” with tracking and bullshit.

        • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Nor do you get TV tuners. While most geeks probably couldn’t care less, any associated family do prefer to watch Great British Bake-off as it airs.

          • madjo@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I would use an Apple TV or a Chromecast in that case. Most TV providers that I know offer their own mediabox anyway, so no need for TV Tuners anymore.

          • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            My country just disabled radio and tv over coax wire and provider send ip-TV boxes.
            This allows to have now faster internet, which I like.

          • Routhinator@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            They do, but they much more expensive than a smart TV, even though they have less components… Because a Smart TV is sold for less because its providing the vendor access to you as a product to all of their 3rd party partners.

          • Routhinator@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I will add that you can also still get Westinghouse dumb TVs with included DVD player and USB video player, 3x HDMI and a tuner, but 1080p and Max 36"

          • FG_3479@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            It doesn’t matter if you get one. They are the cheapest and best image quality TVs available, and many like Samsung’s let you set them up without connecting to Wi-Fi.

            • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah, is a fucking sad state of affairs. I actually paid extra for my dumb TV, but then hooked up a jailbroken firestick so I guess I’m a hypocrite.

              • FG_3479@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I understand why, but you didn’t have to. Many smart TVs let you set them up without Wi-Fi and just use the HDMI ports.

                Samsung, LG, and Google TV models do, but Roku and Fire TV do not.