• 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I have been afforded NO due process by the Committee. I have committed no ethical violation and am guilty of no wrongdoing,” he wrote.

    “Mr. Wood claims that he was ‘afforded NO due process,’” the order read, “but he does not explain why his opportunity to respond to the Committee’s recommendation is not sufficient due process. Moreover, he asks for no additional process in his response.”

    Another reason to disbar him. He doesn’t know what due process is! If you’re making the argument to a judge, there’s a good chance that is your due process. Try not to blow it.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      In this case he knows perfectly well, he just needs his martyrdom sound bites so he can parlay this into a punditry job on the right-wing media circuit. This is a real career path for these clowns, and a lucrative one. He’ll probably run into Vivek Ramaswamy there too.

      • DrPop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean they currently are claiming this is Biden weaponizing the law even though most of his trials are at the state level. At this point I feel being Trump’s lawyer will end in disbarment due to the need to stretch the truth til it snaps to keep trump out of jail .