TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoSay Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagatewww.vice.comexternal-linkmessage-square261linkfedilinkarrow-up1626arrow-down110
arrow-up1616arrow-down1external-linkSay Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagatewww.vice.comTheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square261linkfedilink
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI would assume with arrays they will use a different way to calculate parity or have higher redundancy to compensate the risk.
minus-squareFrezik@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIf there’s higher redundancy, then they are already giving up on density. We’ve pretty much covered the likely ways to calculate parity.
I would assume with arrays they will use a different way to calculate parity or have higher redundancy to compensate the risk.
If there’s higher redundancy, then they are already giving up on density.
We’ve pretty much covered the likely ways to calculate parity.