Four months ago, we asked Are LLMs making Stack Overflow irrelevant? Data at the time suggested that the answer is likely “yes:”

  • vermaterc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    What exactly do you accuse Stack Overflow for? As far as I know this service has always been free to use and data is easily downloadable.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Free to use” on a VC-backed service just means you’re the product. I am accusing them of the same thing I’m accusing each VC-backed service: That they exploit our efforts to cash out and then sell the service for someone who will enshittify it for profit.

      Also, what do you mean “easily downloadable”? Can anyone download the entire corpus of SO in a way that they could set up their own SO with the same content to bootstrap them?

      • vermaterc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also, what do you mean “easily downloadable”? Can anyone download the entire corpus of SO in a way that they could set up their own SO with the same content to bootstrap them?

        have you seen: https://archive.org/details/stackexchange

        That they exploit our efforts to cash out and then sell the service for someone who will enshittify it for profit.

        Can you give an example of this enshittification for profit?