• Firefox offers better privacy and security than Chrome, with upcoming support for 200 new add-ons. • While Chrome dominates, Firefox gains ground with user-friendly browsing experience and open-source model. • Mozilla’s focus on user privacy and transparency challenges Google’s ad-centric approach, making Firefox a viable alternative.

  • wesley@yall.theatl.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    The mobile experience of Firefox with ad block is so much better than Chrome. Using chrome on mobile makes the Internet feel broken to me. I can’t go back.

    • prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brave has the best mobile experience IMO. Built-in dark content (this is gamechanger, dark reader is broken on FF mobile, slow and breaks pages), background playback (though this has FF also), very fast, more than FF. Powerful rust-written adblocker (though UBO is better but is slow and broke some pages on mobile). The only thing that could improve more is extensions capacity.

          • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            you won’t get one “they heard it” . I prefer firefox because I’ve used it for almost 2 decades and know it inside-out, but brave is solid too. As long as it remains open source I’m fine with it , and it’s my “chrome backup” when a page is designed for chrome

            • prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              you won’t get one “they heard it” The political bias here is real. Seeking the truth is more important than beliefs.

            • prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I need more up to date reasons lol. We are in 2023, on those times brave hasn’t even the 0.0001% of market share…

      • the_q@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        The CEO of brave is a piece of shit that should not be supported or promoted.

      • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        ublock is not slow, the difference between it and rust is insignificant if you look at page load time data with a similar set of block lists.

        • prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am talking about Firefox ANDROID. Brave have native adblocker, it’s not for the fact that Rust is fast (that is), its because it’s native. the same way dark reader slows down dramatically some sites on ANDROID. Chromium have native dark mode for contents.