hydroptic@sopuli.xyz to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 4 months ago"☹️".reverse() == "🙂"sopuli.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1231arrow-down115cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1216arrow-down1external-link"☹️".reverse() == "🙂"sopuli.xyzhydroptic@sopuli.xyz to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square26fedilinkcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up15·edit-24 months agoAlso, it should turn an error into an empty but successful call. /s
minus-squarehydroptic@sopuli.xyzOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·4 months agoCalling reverse() on a function should return its inverse
minus-squaretetris11@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·4 months agoisprime.reverse(True) // outputs 19 billion prime numbers. Checkmate, atheists.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoIt’s a just a joke, but I feel like that actually says something pretty profound about duck typing, and how computable it actually is.
Also, it should turn an error into an empty but successful call. /s
Calling
reverse()on a function should return its inverseIt’s a just a joke, but I feel like that actually says something pretty profound about duck typing, and how computable it actually is.