Varven@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-26 months agoWhat isn't illegal but should be?message-squaremessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareWhat isn't illegal but should be?Varven@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-26 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squarePonyOfWar@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoSmoking. Millions of euros of taxpayer money spent every year on those lung cancer patients which could be well spent elsewhere. It’s also an activity that negatively affects not just the smoker but everyone around them.
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoSmoking is something I truly despise, we all know that it is bad, really bad for you, we teach kids about it, yet people still start smoking. Do as New Zealand did, set a cut off year, if you are born after 2015, you will not be permitted to buy tobacco at all.
minus-squarewewbull@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months agoGreat. You’ve just made another illegal narcotic, a black market and a way of financing illegal activity.
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoI’d agree with you on that if tobacco was completely banned, but banning from a specific age, seems like a fairly low impact.
Smoking. Millions of euros of taxpayer money spent every year on those lung cancer patients which could be well spent elsewhere. It’s also an activity that negatively affects not just the smoker but everyone around them.
Smoking is something I truly despise, we all know that it is bad, really bad for you, we teach kids about it, yet people still start smoking.
Do as New Zealand did, set a cut off year, if you are born after 2015, you will not be permitted to buy tobacco at all.
Great. You’ve just made another illegal narcotic, a black market and a way of financing illegal activity.
I’d agree with you on that if tobacco was completely banned, but banning from a specific age, seems like a fairly low impact.
…and as time marches on?