• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m actually gonna give the benefit of the doubt and assume this is actually a grown idiot lol

    • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I still stand by full disk encryption accomplishing almost nothing for the average user but separating them from their own files

      If you don’t have data on your PC that someone might be willing to kill you for, you probably don’t need it, and Microsoft enabling it by default for Win11 installs is crazy

      • neidu2@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’m inclined to somewhat agree. As someone who enjoyed snooping around a mostly unencrypted and insecure internet 25 years ago, I can wholeheartedly tell you that most people’s files are pretty boring.

        Corporate computers on the other hand…

      • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean, I think it’s a good idea to enable it on a laptop.

        I mean if someone steals your laptop they can access all your files without it, and even though 90% of files may be useless there’s always chances to find passwords (often reused, even if encrypted can be decrypted if they aren’t strong), bank details, documents, etc oh and cookies for your browser sessions etc etc. If I were a laptop thief (which I’m not) I’d probably look for those too before formatting everything, that could be extra money.

        That’s why I encrypt my laptop’s drive. That way even if it’s stolen the only thing I have to really worry about is not having a laptop anymore.

        • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah but I don’t think the average smash and grab thief is going to be smart enough to recognize the potential value of the data on the laptop, they’re just going to pawn the thing off as quickly as possible

          Anyone smart enough to want the data probably doesn’t need to smash a window, they’ll just access the data remotely when the computer is on and the drive is unencrypted

          So even then, it only protects you from the very narrow overlap of thieves who are dumb enough to need to break into cars for a living, but smart enough to harvest data off of stolen laptops

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This ‘compress’ everything is such a waste of CPU and energy. Plus “oops, all your files are gone, tee hee”. GZ everywhere is fucking stupid. More complexity for zero benefit.

      - CTO at my previous company

      • twei@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        To be fair: there are many things where compression is a waste of CPU time, like fonts and about 90% of non-text media as they’re already compressed

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          What, you don’t love downloading a zip file that contains an msi (which is perfectly capable of internally compressing much of its internal data)?