Rep. Joseph Morelle of New York, the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, sent a letter to colleagues informing them of his intent to file the resolution, which would kickstart what’s traditionally a cumbersome amendment process.

“This amendment will do what SCOTUS failed to do — prioritize our democracy,” Morelle said in a statement to AP.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Here’s the problem with a constitutional amendment:

    You will never, ever get a single politician to vote for an amendment specifically designed to weaken the power of their own party leader. No Republican will ever vote for this, especially right now when there’s so much momentum going Trump’s way. It. Will. Never. Happen.

    I have a better chance of Taylor Swift dumping her boyfriend and declaring her undying love for me during her next concert than a single Republican voting in favor of this. This is performance and nothing more.

    The only realistic path to reversing this is:

    • Electing Biden or whoever the Dem nominee is in November.
    • Hope that Thomas and Alito die, retire, get abducted by aliens, or whatever during Biden’s term so Biden can replace them with two liberal judges, giving liberals a 5-4 majority.
    • Bring a case to the court (I don’t know who would have standing to bring such a case, but…) to give the Supreme Court the opportunity to reverse that decision.

    Rinse and repeat for every bad decision this half-baked court has made.

    This is it. That is the only path. Any other attempt to fix these problems either require a constitutional amendment no GOP politician or governor would ever vote for or ratify or can simply be struck down by the very Supreme Court that caused this mess in the first place.

    • Switchy85@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      About the standing thing: the beauty is the current Supreme Court has eliminated that as a real requirement, so you can just have someone sue for theoretical harm and be all good.

    • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you have a majority on the court that takes this disastrous decision as seriously as they should and are ready to overturn it, then it’s fairly easy to get the case to happen. You just need to have a sitting president tell the justice department to bring a case against him. Doesn’t have to be for anything big, just literally any criminal offense that can be brought to trial and appealed. He can even appeal directly to the supreme court and ask that they expedite the appeal. They hear the appeal, issue a ruling, and the precedent is gone.