• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Absolute coincidence that this was the rise of neoliberism…

    /s

    Seriously tho, it’s concerning they don’t mention this is when Dems started trying to compromise with Republicans on fiscal policy which drove republicans further right to differentiate.

    • Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This article is specifically talking about how Republicans went from Regan -> Trump and you’re over here going WhAT abOuT tHE dEMoCrAtS?

      Besides, the interview specifically talks about how Regan buttfucked the left at the end of the cold war and that they had nothing to offer the public in return, and how they utterly failed to provide a meaningful alternative.

      Neolibs are scum, but that’s not the point of this article.

      Dems started trying to compromise with Republicans on fiscal policy which drove republicans further right to differentiate.

      “Waaaaaaaa the evil democrats forced us to be Nazis with their wicked compromise ideology! Don’t you see this is all their fault!”

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        If someone told you smoking 50 packs a cigarette a day could lead to lung cancer…

        Would you say they’re trying to defend cancer?

        Or do you think they’re stating a simple case of cause and effect?

        • Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I think a better analogy would be that someone wrote an article about how cigarettes cause cancer but a random commentator complains that they don’t talk about radon.

          Does radon cause lung cancer? Yes. Is that what the article is talking about? No.

          Was I being an inflammatory asshole in my first comment? Yeah, sorry. I’m argumentative today. I try to not be but sometimes I can’t help it; I’m working on it though.

    • Maeve@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, I thought the article was about that and ideas for correcting neoliberalism and how to root it out, effectively. I was sorely disappointed.

    • hypnoton@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      As intended by the Dem elites.

      It’s not an oopsie. They think we are too dumb to see through their chicanery.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s always been their modis operandi, push right-wing legislation. Then when they get busted they claim they were short-sighted.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Bill Clinton and his DLC not only started the momentum of pushing the party to the right and that momentum hasn’t stopped, but has accelerated at enormous speed