The over 900-page document, commissioned by the people expected to run another Trump White House, is a laundry list of the far-right’s most politically toxic ideas, from banning abortion nationwide to mass firing federal officials who believe in protecting public health and safety. One would think that Trump and his allies would try to keep their sinister plans out of public view. Instead, Team Trump published their fascistic blueprint on a website for anyone to read,. They even proudly display the menacing “Project 2025” label on the front page.

On Sunday, actress Taraji P. Henson took a break during the BET Awards, which she was hosting, to speak out about Project 2025. “The Project 2025 plan is not a game. Look it up!” she told viewers. “I’m talking to all the mad people that don’t want to vote. You’re going to be mad about a lot of things if you don’t vote.”

The clip went viral, amplified by other celebrities like Mark Ruffalo. So the MAGA forces swung into action on social media, accusing Henson and Ruffalo and other progressives of making it all up. “Is Project 2025 in the room with you?” a blue-checked user sneered under Ruffalo’s tweet. These efforts at gaslighting people run against a real problem, however: The drafters of Project 2025 seek to promote their authoritarian playbook. Thus, a simple Google search generates a slew of explainers from various news organizations, with even more coming out rapidly, as a response to the rising number of people asking, “What’s Project 2025?”

“We received a flood of reader inquiries asking if Project 2025 was a real effort,” the fact-checking team at Snopes wrote in their lengthy explainer published Tuesday. Google Trends confirms that the number of searches for “project 2025” has grown dramatically in recent days.

  • scops@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Exactly. It’s all of the quiet parts, but out loud, typed out, indexed, and easily accessible.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not getting my hopes up.

      Republicans are openly planning for genocide, sure, but the Democrats are actively aiding and abetting genocide right now.

      They will not suddenly find their principles and start treating the Reublican party like the existential threat they are. They will not take any action which might ensure Trump loses the election. They are more afraid of losing their campaign financiers than the campaign.

      • blazeknave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah Dems are cancelling abortion, planning massive deportations, taking away tans kids healthcare. Shut the fuck up Russian.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Biden could issue an executive order requiring hospitals in red states to perform abortions or else lose their medicare funding, but won’t.

          Biden could reverse his position on deportations, instead he issued an executive order to reject all asylum requests by undocumented immigrants.

          Biden’s attempt to apply Title IX to trans folks like myself has been nice, but it’s not nearly enough to make me forget what he’s spending my tax dollars on.

          Biden could start doing good and incredibly popular things like ending our support for genocide, but that would piss off AIPAC and those lobbyists opinions’ mean more than those of voters.

          You can tell yourself that I’m a russian bot if that makes you feel better. I hope the comfort of dismissing all criticism as foreign influence is worth the consequences of repeating all the mistakes made in 2016.

          • blazeknave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I interpreted “Dems are aiding and abetting genocide” as Gaza. If not, my point is irrelevant and I misunderstood you in the first place.

            My response was that they aren’t actively bringing active domestic genocide like Trump and P25 have proposed.

            If I understand your point correctly, neither have anything to do with your response about Dems doing nothing proactive to be progressive. That’s a separate problem with which I agree with you.

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              5 months ago

              I interpreted “Dems are aiding and abetting genocide” as Gaza.

              That’s only the most egregious example, I have to be nonspecific because of how many ethnic groups the Democrats are helping wipe out. Between letting the Navy poison Hawaii’s water supply and supporting the ongoing economic blockade of Puerto Rico, you’re spoiled for domestic options.