• SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    And yes, a jury did convict Trump based on the instructions they were given from the corrupt judge

    That is not how this trial nor any trial works. It is pretty bad that you fail at that basic knowledge which seems to be what your whacko conspiracy relies on. Sorry but that part is wrong which makes your whole premise fall apart.

    • NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Historically, most successful appeals were the result of overlooked errors in jury instructions – often these errors were verbose instructions that confused jurors. For an appeal to be successful, the jury instructions have to be read as a whole and found to contain errors that were not harmless, but rather which ultimately made for an unfair trial. —Cornell Law School

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Guess what has not been done yet? A successful appeal.

        Here’s your source, BTW since you failed to actually link it:

        https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jury_instructions

        It goes on to say:

        Appeals due to errors in jury instruction have been greatly reduced by the implementation of model, standard, or pattern instructions for specific jurisdictions.

        The instructions given to the jury were clear and standard. They were unanimous in their decision. So keep grasping at straws.

        • NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Standard? Right…keep telling yourself that. And if you really knew much about law, you’d know that a successful appeal can’t happen that fast. The process has been started though, and they’ve already delayed his sentencing, so we’ll see