• Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Makes sense. Anyone who needs it probably needs integrate better, or possibly their male relatives.

      • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You are altering facts. We are not talking about women, we are talking about little girls. Whatever your opinion is, you still have to remember this

        • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          what constitutes little girls to you? Normalment this kind of attire is worn for religious reasons starting with puberty, so 12+. And even then the question still stands, why the state should decide what girls must not wear

            • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Considering 12 years old to not have any form of self consciousness and decision making is insanity. Also what kind of pedo-stuff is it to force teenage girls to wear clothes that are deemed revealing enough?

              • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Who the hell said children had no form of self consciousness and decision making? It’s funny to see you trying to reverse the implicit accusation I made in my last comment. Doesn’t make sense btw

                • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That is the implication when you say it is necessary to ban them from wearing certain clothes bevause you falsely assume they’d all be forced to wear it and never could wear it out of their own decision

          • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because it is an excellent tool to oppress and separate woman and girls from, for example, non-believers. It’s also a way to make them remember the religious nonsensical rules all the time. That’s the whole reason these veils exist.

                  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Not every rule is oppressive. For it to be considered oppressive the result has to be harmful. Why is it harmful when girls don’t cover their bodies?

                    If they really chose to cover their bodies freely, so not because they are scared or because they were told that’s wrong, where’s the harm in not wearing it at school?