• dave@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Surely boilerplate code is copy / paste or macros, then edit the significant bits—a lot less costly than copilot.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      That would still make more effort.

      So, for an example we use a hook called useChanges() for tracking changes to a model in the client, it has a very standard set of arguments.

      Why would we want to waste time writing it out all the time when we can write the usual comment “Product Model” and have it do the work.

      Copy and Paste takes more effort as we WILL have to change the dynamic parts every time, macros will take longer as we have to create the macros for every different convention we have.

      If you can’t see the benefit of LLMs as a TOOL to aid developers then I would hazard a guess you are not in the industry or you just haven’t even given them a go.

      I will say I am a new developer and not amazing, but my boss the owner and lead engineer is a certified genius, who will write flawless code on damn teams to help me along at times, and if he can benefit from it in time saved then anybody would.

      • dave@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        My PhD was in neural networks in the 1990s and I’ve been in development since then.

        Remember when digital cameras came out? They were pretty crappy compared to film—if you had a decent film camera and knew what you were doing. I fell like that’s where we’re at with LLMs right now.

        Digital cameras are now pretty much on par with film, perhaps better in some circumstances and worse in others.

        Shifting gear from writing code to reviewing someone else’s is inefficient. With a good editor setup and plenty of screen real estate, I’m more productive just writing than constantly worrying about what the copilot just inserted. And yes, I’ve tested that.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Clearly what works for our company ain’t what would work for you, even if I think it’s preposterous what you’re claiming.

          My boss was working on Open Source from the BSD days and is capable of very low level programming. He has forgotten more than I’ll ever know, and if he can find LLMs a useful tool for our literal company to improve productivity then I’m inclined to stick with what I have seen and experienced. Just not having to do and search documentation alone is a massive time saver. Unless obviously you know everything, which nobody does.