• henfredemars@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who knew that removing functionality and limiting access to your product was the path to social media success.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The didn’t buy Twitter for a profit.

    He bought Twitter to destroy it because big free horizontal communication platforms are bad for billionaires.

    He can’t just close it, so he just destroy it little by little until it is no more.

    The same way conservative groups bought Tumblr because it was too sexual liberating for their conservative views.

    • notatoad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      he offered to buy twitter for a joke, and he actually did buy twitter because a court forced him to. not because this was some grand plan to accomplish anything - he literally spent months in court arguing that he shouldn’t have to buy twitter, and he lost. that’s the only reason he owns twitter now.

      • JoYo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        the court didn’t force him, he could have paid a penalty that was much lower than his current losses.

      • JoYo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is also the case, however he had the option to drop out with much lower losses.