You may have noticed a distinct lack of return2ozma. This is due to their admitting, in a public comment, that their engagement here is in bad faith:

I’m sure there will be questions, let me see if I can address the most obvious ones:

  1. Can I still post negative stuff about Biden?

Absolutely! We have zero interest in running an echo chamber. However, if ALL you’re posting is negative, you may want to re-think your priorities. You get out of the world what you put into it and all that.

  1. Why now?

Presumption of innocence. It may be my own fault, but I do try to think the best of people, and even though they were posting negative articles, they weren’t necessarily WRONG. Biden’s poll numbers, particularly in minority demographics ARE in the shitter. They are starting to get better, but he still has a hell of a hill to climb.

  1. Why a 30 day temp ban and not a permanent ban?

The articles return2ozma shared weren’t bad, faked, or from some wing-nut bias site like “beforeitsnews.com”, they were legitimate articles from established and respected news agencies, pointing out the valid problems Biden faces.

The problem was ONLY posting the negatives, over and over and then openly admitting that dishonest enagement is their purpose.

Had they all been bullshit articles? It would not have taken anywhere near this much time to lay the ban and it would have been permanent.

30 days seems enough time for them to re-think their strategery and come back to engage honestly.

tl;dr - https://youtu.be/C6BYzLIqKB8#t=7s

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    Amazing you managed to not respond to a single argument and went for ad hominems and proving my point.

    • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nothing here is ad hominem if it’s true. You HAVE been banned for misinformation, you ARE defending OP

      There is no argument to respond to as you’ve not made one.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I am unsure why you are appealing to authority in a post questioning said authority.

        If you have nothing but ad-hominems I have nothing to respond to anymore.

            • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah, seriously. With this specific person, all you have to do is ask a question. If the answer doesn’t benefit their agenda in any way, it’s a personal attack.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh Linkerbaan, are you really calling out people for not responding to your argument? You, of all people?

      Your primary mo is to go in every thread and screech “Zionist” before anyone dares question your posts or comments and you want to talk about ad hominem? Cute.