• Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    How like a Republican to ask an “expert” instead of, you know, actual experts.

    This is what you get when you continuously elect lawmakers with no political experience.

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m surprised he didn’t just start typing the law on his cell phone and finish it by repeatedly selecting the middle option in the phone’s predictive text.

    • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is what you get when you continuously elect lawmakers with no political experience.

      I’m actually fine with electing inexperienced lawmakers. I just want ones who are willing to ask for help/advice from others qualified to give it. Continuously electing beltway insiders just preserves the status quo

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, what I should have said was

        electing lawmakers who’s only goal is to break the government.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    So can we poison chatgpt and other language models to write more socially liberal laws when these people try and use it?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “And so when I was trying to write the technical portion of it, in terms of what sort of technological processing makes something a deepfake, I was kind of struggling with the terminology.

    The Federal Communications Commission, meanwhile, will consider whether to require disclaimers on AI-generated content on political ads running on radio and TV, the Associated Press reported Wednesday.

    Rather than outlaw or curb usage, Kolodin wanted to give people a mechanism to have the courts weigh in on the truthfulness of a deepfake.

    Kolodin said disclaimers carry speech concerns for him, too, because they cut into airtime or, in some cases, ruin the joke or the point of a message.

    Kolodin hopes his bill will become a model for other states because he has worried that well-intentioned efforts to regulate AI in elections could trample on speech rights.

    “And when you have politicians regulating speech, you kind of have the fox guarding the hen house, so they’re gonna say, oh, anything that makes me look silly is a crime.


    The original article contains 953 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!