Germany’s AfD party on Wednesday banned its leading candidate from appearing at EU election campaign events, after France’s main far-right party announced a split with the Germans over a slew of scandals involving the politician.

    • Opafi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I thought calling somebody “not-a-nazi” would be okay, but guess I just gotta try to be better. Sorry, didn’t want to mess with the Grundgesetz.

      • intelisense@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think you misunderstand me - surely being a member of an SS paramilitary group is a violation of the constitution?

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          No that’s impossible. The (there only ever was the SS, not an number of them) SS was the paramilitary arm of the NSDAP, the political party of Hitler. And it was dissolved with the Third Reich before the Grundgesetz was adopted.

          • intelisense@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            It sounds like the constitution defines Nazism in narrower terms than I expected. That’s a shame.

            • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              You seem to be misunderstanding both the quote and the comment! No offense, i can see how it could be confusing.

              What Krah said was meant in a historical context. Kind of a “not all SS-members were criminals”, basically downplaying the Nazis crimes.

              The commenter sarcastically called him “totally not a nazi” for that statement.