• Tayb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    There isn’t really a hunting versus non-hunting firearm is the primary reason. People do use AR pattern rifles to hunt in certain states. Disabled hunters can find that the rifle is easier to handle where a more “traditional” style rifle isn’t as well. It’s just a really tough distinction to even start making.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s a very easy distinction. A semi-automatic rifle is not a hunting rifle. A hunting rifle is a bolt-action. There is absolutely no legitimate reason for any private individual to own a semi-automatic rifle.

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Bolt action has nothing to do with hunting rifle. As the person you replied to stated, people use a wide variety of rifles and other weapons to hunt with based upon what they are hunting, where, and their own physical capabilties. Semiauto rifles have been sold as hunting rifles for the last 80 years.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Wow this is lever-action erasure and I won’t stand for it.

        Hey maybe don’t talk about guns if you don’t know about guns.

      • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        A semiautomatic rifle is 100% a hunting rifle, because it’s designed for hunting other humans. There is a legitimate reason for private individuals to own one: disabled, elderly, and women can use easier due to its ergonomics.

        Could you imagine a world where we socially gated hobbies based on your physical abilities?