Florida scientists have reported the first known and fatal case of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza in a bottlenose dolphin.

  • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    What matters more for public health risk is virility, and mortality tends to have a negative correlation with virility. In simpler terms, the more deadly it is the worse it is at spreading. It’s not a hard rule but is true more often than not, though I don’t know any details about avian flu. I assume if the CDC has determined the public health risk is low that it’s probably because it’s not particularly virile.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      virility

      Do you mean transmissibility? I get what you mean, but I’ve never heard this word used this way. (Virulence is, more or less, the non-fatal version of mortality – how much damage the disease does – so not that.)

      Be that as it may, once the disease is established in a new species it tends to get less harmful because of exactly what you’re talking about – but plenty of diseases through history have been in the short run both fast-spreading and deadly, especially right after they jump into a new population. Which is exactly what H5N1 is doing right now (on all three counts).

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      One of the reasons how deadly it is correlates to lower spreading is just how quickly deadly things kill.

      If something like the original SARS had a 7 day infectious window before killing you things would have been very different.

      I’d be interested to know how quickly it incapacitates humans, and how long you’re infectious for.

      Edit: changed infectious window, accidentally used a incubation period by mistake.