• aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The only way in my eyes to become a billionaire is off the suffering of others. So their association and ability to spend that money is their benefit. Whether attained by them or others. They still play an important role in the destruction of those other human beings production and value.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      The only way in my eyes to become a billionaire is off the suffering of others.

      So what if I brought a $10 insulin vial to market and sold 100 million units?

      Is that taking advantage of the suffering of others? How is being a billionaire different than being a millionaire in that sense? Doesn’t money come when you provide something more valuable than the money to someone else?

      • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It depends on how you are viewing the situation and at what point you are declaring ownership. “I” brought. No you and the people who work for you brought it to market. Instead of sharing that wealth with the workers that created the value. You’ve hoarded it to get rich. And created suffering for those workers as their value was stolen from them to line your pockets. So “you” could bring something to market.

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That isn’t $1b of wealth or profit. You did not do that alone either.