The French government issued a decree Tuesday banning the term “steak” on the label of vegetarian products, saying it was reserved for meat alone.

  • Vegoon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Do you buy [generic animal steak] or do you buy cattle, bison, buffalo, camel, goat, horse, kangaroo, sheep, ostrich, pigs, turkey, or deer steak?

    People sometimes act like that the description of steak or milk (cow, human, goat, cat) is unambiguous. I have never seen plant based food which does not declare it like [plant based steak]

    I am all in for clear description of food and a big label if it contains animal suffering and the destruction of the eco system or if it is plant based. If you don’t care which animal parts you buy as long as “meat” or “steak” is any death animal I think you are in the minority.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you buy [generic animal steak] or do you buy cattle, bison, buffalo, camel, goat, horse, kangaroo, sheep, ostrich, pigs, turkey, or deer steak?

      In Italy (and as far as I remember even in France) they are divided into different aisles, so in a certain aisle you will find only meat from a certain animal.

      People sometimes act like that the description of steak or milk (cow, human, goat, cat) is unambiguous. I have never seen plant based food which does not declare it like [plant based steak]

      It is not the point, I also never see a plant based food not declared, but I think it is right to not be able to call “milk” what you get from a almond.

      I am all in for clear description of food and a big label if it contains animal suffering and the destruction of the eco system or if it is plant based. If you don’t care which animal parts you buy as long as “meat” or “steak” is any death animal I think you are in the minority.

      Or maybe we just think that words has a meaning.

      • Vegoon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Or maybe we just think that words has a meaning.

        I guess you have a strong opinion on calling a bond between two man or two woman marriage?

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not particularly. For what I think is the marriage is, I simply don’t care and, oddly enough, the law about the civil marriage cite the words “husband” and “wife” only once, the other times it use the word “consorts” that here is neutral, and in the context it simply mean “both of you”. So even the law seem to don’t care (mostly) about the sex of the people getting married.

          • Vegoon@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            So it was always the way that same sex marriage was accepted and nobody had to fight against people who claim “but the bible …” “It is between a man a women and nothing else” “next you want to marriage you dog”, right? There where never people who fought to change the system because the system and the laws have always been perfect?

            • gian @lemmy.grys.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              So it was always the way that same sex marriage was accepted and nobody had to fight against people who claim “but the bible …” “It is between a man a women and nothing else” “next you want to marriage you dog”, right?

              That’s not what I said. I just stated what I think and what the law say in Italy. I am not responsible for what other people think.

              There where never people who fought to change the system because the system and the laws have always been perfect?

              If we are talking about the marriage, I can agree with you, in fact in Italy we have other forms of unions (which don’t make any difference between the sexes) to substitute the marriage which for the State are like a marriage. Note that even if conceptually they are the same thing, we call with different names exactly because in Italy the marriage is way too often identified with the religious one, which for the law is void (ie if you are only married relligiously, which means the 3 law article I cited are not read, then for the State you are not married). We have not tried to change the meaning of a specific word.

    • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Mentioned in another thread. I buy meat cuts the same way I buy a head of broccoli, pass by the aisle look at it and grab it. And so does the fucking majority of population that are busy and would like to continue to do so and not need to read the fine printing

      I can identify a beef steak from pork, lamb, chicken and horse by the look of the meat and by the cut. I do so routinely and so do everyone that shops for meat.

      The same way I can tell a head of broccoli from say cauliflower.

      A meat replacement beef stake looks exactly like a beef steak. If it also says steak on the packaging people can just grab it and go. Definition of mislabelling.

      Now, I’ve already covered this in other comments so if you are about to say this is my fucking problem and that I should learn to read. No, this is every customer’s problem. People are busy, elderly people might not bring their glasses to the supermarket and more in general the EU is on the side of the customer so no, company that sell something should label it clearly particularly if it could be deceiving.

      If you are about to give me the poor meat eaters, treated unwell consider that vegetarians and vegans have more to lose. What if the tables turn and dodgy vendors are allowed to label their product vegan friendly even tho6they might not be.

      • Vegoon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        If it also says steak on the packaging people can just grab it and go. Definition of mislabelling.

        I have never seen just [Steak] on any package. You have proven that you know words by writingen them. I reckon you can read them too.

        Would it be fine for you to start selling dog steak just labeld as steak? They take great care and pride to label it correctly https://www.elwooddogmeat.com/ They make sure you know what you get because it is a premium product. If you just buy storebrand animal meat and don’t care about who it was I can’t help you.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I have never seen just [Steak] on any package. You have proven that you know words by writingen them. I reckon you can read them too.

          I don’t know where you buy your food, but here I can clearly see meat labeled as “steak” in my supermarket.

        • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ah yes you have proven that I can read therefore it is okay to mislabel products across a whole country and potentially mislead other people. Checkmate.

          Or how about we protect customers and try not to mislabel products?

          What’s with the dog meat? I believe it’s illegal everywhere in Europe isn’t it? Otherwise, just meat so yeah technically a steak.