• HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    One question though: if I take the paid subscription, will meta keep harvesting my data and selling it to third parties? An ad-free Facebook is different from a tracking-free Facebook

    • _s10e@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Actual answer over circle-jerk speculation: To be legal in EU, they must offer one option without required (=forced) consent to tracking. When you pay, you can actually opt-out from any measure that require consent under GDPR.

      All European publishers do this. They don’t want your money and probably don’t care much about the tiny minority that actually pays for freedom from tracking. This option exist to create the illusion of choice.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is nothing on this cold, moist rock that will stop companies from harvesting and selling your data other than the inevitable embrace of death.

    • Virkkunen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hold your horses, they only said “ad free”, “tracking free” is beyond the scope, making this essentially a double dip.

  • Crit@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe if they hadn’t already harvest my data for decades. Now that it’s no longer as profitable they want me to pay to just avoid being nagged?

  • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s telling that this is omly for GDPR countries. They don’t want YOUR money, they want advertisers’ and data analysts’ money. A subscription isn’t as profitable as selling your personal data. How fucked up is that?

  • Pechente@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    I would have loved this option like 10 years ago – when it wasn’t clear what a toxic company facebook is.

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Would’ve caught zero traction then lol. You can only do this if you have a very established and dedicated userbase already. Trying this from scratch with little users is a death sentence.

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The relevant reasoning [of how this makes sense in terms of alternative to privacy and regarding GDPR compliance]:

    The option for people to purchase a subscription for no ads balances the requirements of European regulators while giving users choice and allowing Meta to continue serving all people in the EU, EEA and Switzerland. In its ruling, the CJEU expressly recognised that a subscription model, like the one we are announcing, is a valid form of consent for an ads funded service.